RePowerEU: 40 NGOs demand EU to end support for bioenergy made from agricultural crops and forest biomass
In May 2022, the EU Commission will release its RePowerEU Strategy, aiming to reduce the EU’s dependence on Russian fossil fuels.
Together with 40 other civil society stakeholders BirdLife strongly cautions against pursuing false solutions. This includes building more fossil gas infrastructure, leading to stranded assets, reactivating or extending the operation of coal, burning more trees or crops for energy – something that will simply increase emissions and pollution compared to fossil fuels and harm food security
While we stand ready to help in efforts to reduce EU dependence on fossil fuel imports, we call upon the European Commission to ensure that, in its final RePowerEU strategy, this doesn’t come at the cost of fighting climate change, species loss and food security globally; costs that would be incurred by continuing or even increasing our reliance on crop-based biofuels, by opening up biodiversity set-aside areas for additional farming, or increasing pressure on our forests through more production of energy from burning wood.
We expect RePowerEU to provide a clear strategy for the EU to shift away from its dependence on fossil fuels altogether and in particular to not fall in the trap of replacing Russian imports with fuels from other authoritarian regimes or economies which will only continue to perpetuate Europe’s energy dependence.
Therefore, we call on the Commission to support the following short-term measures in its RePowerEU strategy:
● Focus on measures to cut energy demand across all sectors.
● End support for crop-based biofuels in the EU’s fuel mix to alleviate pressure on food and feed commodities. We welcome the Commission’s 23 March statement supporting countries that reduce ‘the blending proportion of biofuels which could lead to a reduction of EU agricultural land used for production of biofuel feedstocks’. Support for these fuels must be fully ended, especially under the Renewable Energy Directive, the Effort Sharing Regulation and the State aid guidelines.
● Restrict biogas production to biowaste and residue feedstocks. The Commission has indicated its intention to increase ambition for ‘sustainable biogas’ production, but dedicated crops should be clearly ruled out on climate, biodiversity and food security grounds and caution is needed about the potential volumes of EU biogas production from biowaste and residues.
● Reduce industrial animal farming. By reducing the unsustainable need for feed crops, this will in return free up land for direct food production, carbon sequestration and nature restoration, and allow the EU to reduce its dependence on both fertilisers made from natural gas and on pesticides.
In parallel, the Commission must support a rapid acceleration in renewable energy technologies that are low carbon and ecologically sustainable by:
● Accelerating the transition towards wind and solar power, district heating supplied by heat pumps, and all forms of energy storage.
● A faster transition away from internal combustion engine vehicles and the acceleration of vehicle electrification to reduce transport’s reliance on oil, accompanied by modal shifts, promotion of public transport and other measures to reduce demand for transport
● Ensuring that bioenergy does not require any dedicated use of land or compromise the health and carbon sequestration function of the world’s forests. EU support for burning crops and forest biomass must end as soon as possible.
You might also be interested in:
An exciting new partnership between the Ecological Restoration Fund and BirdLife International and its UK partner, the RSPB, will help support extensive conservation and restoration work along the African-Eurasian flyway, helping to protect vital landscapes and the millions of birds that journey along this route.
Press release – EU Nature Restoration Law: AGRI Committee votes against farmers’ future and food security
This afternoon, the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development (AGRI) of the European Parliament voted for a full rejection of the Commission’s proposal for the EU Nature Restoration Law. With this opinion, the bulk of Members of Parliament is letting down their own constituency of farmers, who are facing the unprecedented impact of the collapse of our ecosystems and climate change.
BirdLife’s new position paper Winds of Change: Powering Healthy Seas through a Nature Positive Energy Transition presents a clear vision for our seas and outlines how the shift to renewable energy sources at sea can catalyse action to combat the interconnected nature and climate crises.
Stichting BirdLife Europe gratefully acknowledges financial support from the European Commission. All content and opinions expressed on these pages are solely those of Stichting BirdLife Europe. The European Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains.