Philippine Scops-owl (Otus megalotis) is being split: list O. nigrorum as Vulnerable and O. megalotis and O. everetti as Near Threatened?

This is part of a consultation on the Red List implications of extensive changes to BirdLife’s taxonomy for non-passerines

Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International will soon publish the HBW-BirdLife Illustrated Checklist of the Birds of the World, building off the Handbook of the Birds of the World series, and BirdLife’s annually updated taxonomic checklist.

The new Checklist will be based on the application of criteria for recognising species limits described by Tobias et al. (2010). Full details of the specific scores and the basis of these for each new taxonomic revision will be provided in the Checklist.

Following publication, an open and transparent mechanism will be established to allow people to comment on the taxonomic revisions or suggest new ones, and provide new information of relevance in order to inform regular updates. We are also actively seeking input via a discussion topic here regarding some potential taxonomic revisions that currently lack sufficient information.

The new Checklist will form the taxonomic basis of BirdLife’s assessments of the status of the world’s birds for the IUCN Red List. The taxonomic changes that will appear in volume 1 of the checklist (for non-passerines) will begin to be incorporated into the 2013 Red List update, with the remainder, and those for passerines (which will appear in volume 2 of the checklist), to be incorporated into subsequent Red List updates.

Preliminary Red List assessments have been carried out for the newly split or lumped taxa. We are now requesting comments and feedback on these preliminary assessments.

Philippine Scops-owl Otus megalotis is being split into O. megalotis, O. everetti and O. nigrorum, following the application of criteria set out by Tobias et al. (2010).

Prior to this taxonomic change O. megalotis (BirdLife species factsheet) was listed as Least Concern on the basis that it was not thought to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under any of the IUCN criteria. This species was estimated to have a very large range, and hence did not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence [EOO] of less than 20,000 km2 combined with a declining or fluctuating range size, habitat extent/quality, or population size and a small number of locations or severe fragmentation). The population trend appeared to be stable, and hence the species does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (at least a 30% decline over ten years or three generations). The population size has not been quantified, but it was not believed to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (fewer than 10,000 mature individuals with a continuing decline estimated to be at least 10% over ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure).

O. nigrorum is found on Negros, in forest and woodland habitats, including forest edge and secondary growth (del Hoyo et al. 1999, Kennedy et al. 2000, König and Weick 2008). It may qualify as Vulnerable under criterion B1ab(ii,iii,v), on the basis that it occupies a small range (with an EOO estimated at c.12,800 km2), in which suitable habitat is severely fragmented and in on-going decline, with inferred declines in the population.

O. megalotis (as defined following the taxonomic change) is found on Luzon, Marinduque and Catanduanes, and O. everetti (incorporating boholensis) is found on Samar, Leyte, Dinagat, Bohol, Mindanao and Basilan, where they occupy forest and woodland, including forest edge and secondary habitats (del Hoyo et al. 1999, Kennedy et al. 2000, König and Weick 2008). It is suggested that both species be listed as Near Threatened under criteria A2c+3c+4c, on the basis that they could be in moderately rapid population decline (approaching 30% over three generations [c.11 years]) owing to on-going habitat loss and degradation.

Comments on these suggested categories are invited and further information would be welcomed.

References:

del Hoyo, J., Elliott, A. and Sargatal, J. (1999) Handbook of the birds of the world, Vol 5: Barn- owls to Hummingbirds. Barcelona, Spain: Lynx Edicions.

Kennedy, R. S., Gonzales, P. C., Dickinson, E. C., Miranda, H. C., Jr. and Fisher, T. H. (2000) A guide to the birds of the Philippines. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

König, C. and Weick, F. (2008) Owls of the world. Second edition. London: Christopher Helm.

Tobias, J. A., Seddon, N., Spottiswoode, C. N., Pilgrim, J. D., Fishpool, L. D. C. and Collar, N. J. (2010) Quantitative criteria for species delimitation. Ibis 152: 724–746.

Related posts:

  1. Scaly Kingfisher (Actenoides princeps) is being split: list A. regalis as Vulnerable and A. princeps as Near Threatened?
  2. Green-backed Kingfisher (Actenoides monachus) is being split: list both A. monachus and A. capucinus as Near Threatened?
  3. Brown Hawk-owl (Ninox scutulata) is being split: list N. randi as Near Threatened?
  4. Lilac-cheeked Kingfisher (Cittura cyanotis) is being split: list both C. cyanotis and C. sanghirensis as Near Threatened?
  5. Archived 2011-2012 topics: Philippine Fairy-bluebird (Irena cyanogastra): eligible for uplisting?
This entry was posted in Asia and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Philippine Scops-owl (Otus megalotis) is being split: list O. nigrorum as Vulnerable and O. megalotis and O. everetti as Near Threatened?

  1. I guess O nigrorum can qualify as Endangered. Current survey we conducted in lowland forest in South-western Negros. The species is quite rare and only confined in lowland forest. We will send more details once we finish the survey.

  2. Ivan Sarenas says:

    I have encountered nigrorum on montane forests on both Negros and Panay. I do agree that it is a low-density species as its calls and replies are very few in the places I have heard them.

Post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Please note that your comment will not appear until it has been approved by a moderator. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Subscribe without commenting