BirdLife

In this Section

What is wrong with the EU Bioenergy Policy?

What are biofuels? Are all form of biofuels good?

Environmental impacts of current biofuels

Social impacts of current biofuels

Other ways of producing bioenergy

Why current biofuels are not the answer to climate change and sustainable development?

EU policies on Renewable Energy

Inadequacy of the Renewable Energy Directive

Indirect Land Use Change - Principles for a correct evaluation of emissions

BirdLife's position on the Bioenergy Policy

Cautions to further biofuels development

Birds which would be threatened by biofuels production

Renewable Energy development - in a strategic and sustainable way can be part of the solution

Bioenergy – a carbon accounting time bomb

EU Policy Issues
Farming for Life
Agriculture in Europe

Related Sites

Printer friendly view

Subscribe to News

 Bookmark & Share Bookmark & Share

Change Language

BirdLife's position on the Bioenergy Policy

Andy Hay (rspb-images.com)
In order to have a sustainable future, we need to reduce our dependence on fossil fuels. BirdLife strongly support the 20% renewable energy target, and sees this as an essential component in the fight against climage change.
Zoom In

The Renewable Energy Directive is key to strong EU action on Climate Change. Without a meaningful Directive the EU will fail a significant part of its commitment to a post-Kyoto global deal on climate change.

It is essential, achievable and necessary that the Renewable Energy Directive does not cause wider ecosystem damage and contribute to climate change itself.

Key BirdLife principles and recommendations on the EU Bioenergy Policy:

  • We strongly support the 20% renewable energy target, and see this as an essential component in the fight against climate change
  • The 10% mandatory target on transport should be dropped from the Renewable Energy Directive until it can be shown that the targets can be met in a truly sustainable manner, taking into account the latest science and evidence on direct and indirect environmental and social impacts of biofuel policy and production.
  • Measures to meet targets must not harm ecosystems and contribute to the current global biodiversity crisis.
  • Measures must contribute to GHG emissions targets, not hinder them. The minimum GHG emissions savings should be set of 60% compared to fossil fuels for biofuels and even higher for other biomass applications, taking into account direct and indirect land-use change and emissions from nitrogen fertilizer use.
  • A new and robust calculation methodology that includes possible indirect land use change caused by new production on biofuels should be put in place.
  • Environmental safeguards must be put in place for ALL renewable energy developments in particular concerning the impacts on natural resources, biodiversity and other environmental and social impacts. The entire biomass chain must be considered including transportation and storage, type of biomass production, chain of custody and trading conditions.
  • A robust and verifiable system of certification should be implemented for all bioenergy ( not just biofuels) based on these standards.
  • A list of feedstocks that do not cause land use change should be created.
  • Measures aimed at reducing emission in the transport sector that have fewer sustainability concerns and higher levels of greenhouse gas emission saving such as managing demand for travel and improved vehicle efficiency should be more actively promoted.
  • A reduction approach of greenhouse gas emission on transport fuels must be taken through the emission reduction mechanism currently proposed in the Fuel Quality Directive i.e. setting a greenhouse gas reduction target that takes into account the full life-cycle of the fuel, rather that setting volume or energy-based targets. The contribution of biofuels to the achievement of such targets should be kept at a sustainable level and linked to the above-mentioned sustainability standards.

BirdLife International

BirdLife's work related to biofuels:

Report

Fuelling the ecological crisis - six examples of habitat destruction driven by biofuels May 2008

 

Briefs

Birdlife and EEB, FERN, Friends of the Earth Europe, Oxfam and Transport & Environment: Biofuels. Handle with care. An analysis of EU policy with recommendations for action. November 2009.

Biofuel. Handle with care ( English Factsheet)

Biofuel. Handle with care ( French Factsheet)

Biofuel. Handle with care ( German Factsheet)

BirdLife and EEB briefing on biofuel sustainability standards for Council Ad Hoc Working Group 7 Mar 2008 (.doc 44KB)

BirdLife initial brief on EU Renewable Energy Directive 25 Feb 2008 (.pdf 190KB)

BirdLife brief to the Energy Working Party Discussion 4 Apr 2006 (.doc 83KB)

BirdLife press releases:

11 Nov 2009 Biofuels, the burning questions

08 Oct 2008 Biofuels debate insight on Birdlife website

05 June 2008 BirdLife welcomes FAO report on bioenergy

06 May 2008 New report shows EU biofuel policy likely to cause worldwide environmental destruction

05 May 2008 Tana biofuel plans could break the law 

22 February 2008 Environmental groups welcome UK government concern over biofuels

24 January 2008 BirdLife and T&E react to biofuels target

21 January 2008 EU biofuels policy left in tatters

08 June 2006 Unsustainable biofuels threaten the environment

08 February 2006 BirdLife urges caution in biofuel drive

BirdLife partners:

BirdLife Finland - Biopolttoaineet

LNVL (Luxmebourg) - Agrokraftstoffe

NABU (Germany)

Natuurpunt (Belgium) - Bio-energie

RSPB (UK) - Biofuels

 

Next Page » Cautions to further biofuels development


Sponsored by:

EU flag

European Union
This website is part-financed by the European Union


Advertising more »

BL Ads