BirdLife

In this Section

Reality Check – Are Common Agricultural Policy subsidies paying for environmental quality?

Agriculture in Europe

Agriculture and biodiversity in the EU

Shortcomings of the current CAP

BirdLife's vision for the future of the CAP

BirdLife's vision for the future of the CAP part 2

BirdLife International's detailed CAP proposal in coalition with EEB, IFOAM, EFNCP and WWF.

The CAP Health Check

“Could do better - How is the EU Rural Development policy delivering for biodiversity?”

Through the green smokescreen - how is CAP cross compliance delivering for biodiversity?

Less Favoured Areas (LFAs) and High Nature Value (HNV) farmland

BirdLife's view on the 'Food security crisis'

Proposals for the future CAP: a joint position from the European Landowners’ Organization and BirdLife International

BirdLife Agriculture Publications

EU Policy Issues
Farming for Life
BirdLife book sale

Printer friendly view

Subscribe to News

 Bookmark & Share Bookmark & Share

Change Language

Through the green smokescreen - How is CAP cross compliance delivering for biodiversity?

BirdLife International

BirdLife International recently launched a new report which reveals how rules attached to EU subsidy receipts are failing biodiversity.

Entitled: ‘Through the green smokescreen. How is CAP cross compliance delivering for biodiversity?’ it analyses the system of rules attached to the receipt of the bulk of EU CAP subsidies which amounts to €31 billion each year. The report underlines the need for fundamental reform of the CAP for the post-2013 period.

Cross compliance is a set of rules, including environmental standards, which beneficiaries of CAP payments are required to respect. Despite representing an important improvement of the CAP, cross compliance is still far from robustly supporting biodiversity protection.

The BirdLife report highlights a number of structural weaknesses affecting the current system of cross compliance and the Single Payment Scheme, which prevent these instruments from delivering for biodiversity and the environment.
 
The report also highlights how environmental rules are often partially implemented, inconsistent and weakly enforced. On the other hand, rules on registration and identification of livestock are being blindly enforced and place a disproportionate burden on extensive livestock systems. These systems, which are crucial for biodiversity, often receive lower subsidies than intensive farms. A similarly inappropriate approach has been taken for standards on preventing scrub encroachment on agricultural land, forcing farmers in Bulgaria, Cyprus and Latvia to damage habitats protected under EU law.

The study calls for a profound reform of the CAP, realigning the whole policy to the principles of rural development policy, which currently represents the best model to reward biodiversity conservation and the delivery of other public goods.

Download the full report here.

Next Page » Less Favoured Areas (LFAs) and High Nature Value (HNV) farmland


Sponsored by:

EU Flag

European Union
This website is part-financed by the European Union


Advertising more »

BL Ads