Justification
This recently described species has a very small range in which suitable habitat is severely fragmented and continuing to decline. As a result, it qualifies as Endangered.
Taxonomic source(s)
SACC. 2006. A classification of the bird species of South America. Available at: http://www.museum.lsu.edu/~Remsen/SACCBaseline.html.
Identification
14.5 cm. Rufous and greyish-olive spinetail with whitish supercilium. Rufous crown, wings and tail, with brownish olive nape, mantle and rump. Prominent whitish supercilium extending from upper lores to rear of crown. Greyish cheek, face, and underparts, except olive-washed vent and rear flanks. Olive-yellow legs and feet. Pinkish deep-based bill with sooty culmen and tip. Voice Short and long songs, in accelerating and descending series, lasting up to 13.5 seconds. Range of single, double and triple-note calls, or even 3-5 notes, usually given in alarm or excitement.
Distribution and populationCranioleuca henricae occurs in dry valleys on the east slope of the Andes in west
Bolivia (Cochabamba and La Paz). The only viable populations known are in the río Cotacajes basin, with one below Inquisivi, La Paz, where it is common, one at Cotacajes, Cochabamba, where it is uncommon, and two recently discovered localities at Machaca and Cuti, both Cochabamba (Maijer and Fjeldså 1997, Herzog
et al. 1999, S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999, 2007). However, a recent visit to Machaca identified only two suitable gulleys, each home to no more than 10 mature trees (F. Rheindt
in litt. 2012). A group of 3-4 birds was found in the gulley closest to town at about 2800m, but none were found at the more distant, higher gulley at c. 2950m, or in any of the low disturbed scrub that now covers the hillsides (F. Rheindt
in litt. 2012). Records of 1-2 individuals come from Churupampa and nearby Sorata in the río Consata basin Maijer and Fjeldså 1997, Lowen and Kennedy 1999)
, and Mecapaca in the upper río La Paz basin, La Paz (B. Hennessey
per S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999)
. A record of a
Cranioleuca sp. in suitable habitat at Saila Pata in the río Cotacajes basin may be attributable to this species (N. Krabbe
per S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999)
. Searches in the Consata basin (where very little suitable habitat remains) and in the lower río La Paz basin have not revealed further localities (S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999, 2007)
. One of the recently discovered populations is highly threatened by a road construction project which will make the area directly accessible from La Paz (S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999, 2007)
. Numbers are probably below 3,000 mature individuals, but are difficult to estimate because of the paucity of data (S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999, 2007)
.
Population justificationThe population is estimated to number 1,000-2,499 mature individuals, based on an assessment by S. K. Herzog (
in litt. 1999) that numbers are probably below 3,000 mature individuals. This is broadly consistent with estimates based on the extent of its range and the density of other
Cranioleuca and
Synallaxis spinetails in the BirdLife Population Densities Database. It equates to a population size of 1,500-3,749 individuals in total, rounded here to 1,500-4,000 individuals.
Trend justificationA slow and continuing population decline is suspected, owing to rates of habitat loss and fragmentation.
EcologyIt occurs in the understorey of dry, seasonally deciduous forest in rain-shadow valleys at c.1,800-3,300 m (Maijer and Fjeldså 1997, Herzog
et al. 1999, S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999, 2007)
. Low, bushy vegetation in adjacent cleared areas may also be used, and one record was in a plantation of exotic
Cupressus sp., but it has not been found in orchards or
Eucalyptus plantations (Maijer and Fjeldså 1997)
. It may depend on the presence of the epiphytic 'grey beard' bromeliad for nesting sites (Hennessey
in litt. 2006)
. A possible juvenile and apparent pairs have been observed in January, while mixed-species feeding parties are joined in the dry season (the austral winter) (Maijer and Fjeldså 1997, Herzog
et al. 1999)
.
ThreatsMuch suitable habitat has long been destroyed or severely degraded (Maijer and Fjeldså 1997, S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999, 2007
). Plantations of
Eucalyptus in the Inquisivi-Quime area, combined with the destruction of native vegetation and high grazing pressure, have caused hydrological changes leading to massive soil erosion and severe landslides (S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999, 2007)
. The destruction of its stronghold by landslides is predicted by 2050, perhaps considerably sooner, unless action is taken (S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999, 2007)
. Dry woodlands in La Paz and Cochabamba are threatened by cutting for firewood, selective logging and poor regeneration because of grazing by goats and burning (Maijer and Fjeldså 1997, S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999, 2007
). One of the two recently discovered populations in the río Cotacajes basin is highly threatened by a road construction project, which will make the area directly accessible from La Paz and make the forest vulnerable to exploitation for charcoal production for the La Paz market (S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999, 2007)
. The process of removing tree limbs for charcoal allows regeneration of the forest, but impacted trees hold less of the epiphytic "grey beard" bromeliad which is the specialized nesting site for the Bolivian Spinetail (S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999, 2007)
. Although many older trees, together with the "grey beard" bromeliad remain at Machaca, pressure from overgrazing by cattle is restricting plant regeneration and is likely to have a negative impact on the forest ecosystem (S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999, 2007)
. The "grey beard" bromeliad may also be less abundant than in the past as a result of
Eucalyptus plantations and agricultural plots above the valleys where it occurs disturbing water retention properties (S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999, 2007)
.
Conservation actions underwayTargeted searches have resulted in some of the most recent records, but also a number of negative results from apparently suitable habitat (Herzog
et al. 1999, S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999, 2007). It is not currently known from any protected areas. Proposals have recently been made to protect the Machaca stronghold by developing a long-term conservation strategy working closely with the local community and involving local environmental education, sustainable development workshops, agricultural assessment and development, and the promotion of the area as a birdwatching attraction; with the eventual aim of protecting a core area as a reserve (S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999, 2007)
.
Conservation actions proposedCarry out surveys to obtain an improved estimate of the population. Monitor population trends through regular surveys. Monitor rates of habitat loss and degradation within its range. Act to prevent further erosion and landslides below Inquisivi (S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999, 2007). Support the maintenance of traditional land-use and tenure systems that allow natural woodland habitats to persist (Maijer and Fjeldså 1997)
. Establish municipal or private reserves that ensure protection of the best remaining forest patches: despite the remoteness of the area, with the new road being built sustainable ethno-ecotourism could be a new source of income for local communities that protect forest patches (S. K. Herzog
in litt. 1999, 2007)
.
References
Maijer, S.; Fjeldså, J. 1997. Description of a new Cranioleuca spinetail from Bolivia and a `leapfrog pattern' of geographic variation in the genus. Ibis 139: 606-616.
Herzog, S. K.; Fjeldså, J.; Kessler, M.; Balderrama, J. A. 1999. Ornithological surveys in the Cordillera Cocapata, depto Cochabamba, Bolivia, a transition zone between humid and dry intermontane Andean habitats. Bulletin of the British Ornithologists' Club 119: 162-177.
Lowen, J. C.; Kennedy, C. P. 1999. Notes on scarce species in La Paz department, Bolivia. Cotinga 12: 82.
Further web sources of information
Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE) species/site profile. This species has been identified as an AZE trigger due to its IUCN Red List status and limited range.
Click here for more information about the Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE)
Hear sounds for this species from xeno-canto, the community database of shared bird sounds from around the world.
View photos and videos, and hear sounds of this species from the Internet Bird Collection
Text account compilers
Pople, R., Sharpe, C J, Stuart, T., Symes, A.
Contributors
Hennessey, A., Herzog, S., Krabbe, N.
IUCN Red List evaluators
Butchart, S., Symes, A.
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2013) Species factsheet: Cranioleuca henricae. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 23/05/2013.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2013) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 23/05/2013.
This information is based upon, and updates, the information published in BirdLife International (2000)
Threatened birds of the world. Barcelona and Cambridge, UK: Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, BirdLife International (2004)
Threatened birds of the world 2004 CD-ROM and BirdLife International (2008) Threatened birds of the world 2008 CD-ROM. These sources provide the information for species accounts for the birds on the IUCN Red List.
To provide new information to update this factsheet or to correct any errors, please email BirdLife
To contribute to discussions on the evaluation of the IUCN Red List status of Globally Threatened Birds, please visit BirdLife's Globally Threatened Bird Forums.
Additional resources for this species
0