This species is classified as Critically Endangered owing to its extremely small population which is declining as a result of hunting pressure.
Phoenicopterus ruber (Sibley and Monroe, 1990, 1993) has been split into P. roseus and P. ruber following Knox et al. (2002), contra SACC (2005).
Distribution and population
60-65 cm. Small forest ibis. Adult has dull olive head and body with slightly bronzed mantle and wing-coverts. Dark area around eyes and base of bill. Voice Various coughed grunts when disturbed and harsh honking when going to roost.
This species is endemic to So Tom, So Tom e Prncipe
, where it is confined to the catchments of the So Miguel, Xufexufe and possibly the Quija rivers in the south-west, and along the Io Grande and Ana Chaves rivers in the centre of the island. It was known only from historical records and anecdotal evidence from hunters until a confirmed sighting in the valley of the rio Ana Chaves, in 1990 (Atkinson et al
. More records followed: birds were seen in 1996; two pairs, an individual and two nests were seen near the basins of the Rios I Grande (200 m asl) and Martim Mendes (100 m asl) in May 1997 in an area where hunters reported killing 16 of the birds 6 months previously (S. d'Assis Lima in litt.
; and during survey work in Ribeira Peixe in 2007 (Olmos and Turshak 2007)
. Recent fieldwork has resulted in 57 observations, including two nests with brooding females, in primary forest in the Monte Carmo area (Maia and Gascoigne in litt
. The most recent estimation suggests that the population is >50 individuals but remains extremely small (M. Melo in litt
. It is apparently relatively widely, if thinly, distributed in the south. There is one historical record from the north of the island, but no suitable habitat remains there (Christy and Clarke 1998)
. Population justification
The most recent population estimate indicates that it is extremely small, and is best placed in the band 50-249 mature individuals (M. Melo in litt.
2006). This equates to 75-374 individuals in total, rounded here to 70-400 individuals.Trend justification
Hunting pressure is suspected to be high with a recent report of 16 individuals being killed (S. d'Assis Lima in litt.
This species is presumed to be sedentary (del Hoyo et al
. Birds usually occur singly or in pairs (Borrow and Demey 2001)
but roost together at night and can be identified as they call when flying to and from the roost (M. Melo in litt
The species is confined to primary forest below 450 m, although suitable habitat could extend up to 800 m. However, it has been found most frequently in recent years at the border between primary and secondary forest, sometimes near palm plantations (M. Melo in litt
. Recent observations from Monte Carmo were from mature or old second-growth forest (Olmos and Turshak 2010)
. It forages on lowland forest floors in areas of bare ground or where there exists a sparse undergrowth of herbaceous plants, bracken and moss, or a covering of rocks and large stones (Christy and Clarke 1998; Olmos and Turshak 2010). It is especially found in areas where the ground has been disturbed by wild pigs or in swampy areas bordering watercourses or small oxbow lakes (Atkinson et al
. 1991; Christy and Clarke 1998; Borrow and Demey 2001; Olmos and Turshak 2010)
Its diet consists of invertebrates, snails and slugs (Christy and Clarke 1998)
. Breeding site
A nest was found in 1997 in a tree overhanging water (
S. d'Assis Lima in litt.
1998) and a nest found in 2009 was also in a tree (BirdLife International 2008)
Historically, large areas of lowland forest were cleared for cocoa plantations. Today, land privatisation is leading to an increase in the number of small farms and the clearance of trees (M. Melo in litt
. 2006). This does not currently affect primary forest, but may be a threat in the future (A. Gascoigne in litt.
2000). Agricultural encroachment in the more accessible areas of Ob Natural Park was evident in 2007 and 2008, and hunting and palm-wine harvesting were widespread (Olmos and Turshak 2007, 2010), with shelters constructed inside the park (Olmos and Turshak 2010). Hunting may be the most serious current threat; the species is apparently very desirable for its meat and reports include 16 birds being killed in 1996-1997 (S. d'Assis Lima in litt.
2006), and six birds killed on a single occasion by one hunter (del Hoyo et al
. 1992). Hunting pressure is believed to be increasing in the Monte Carmo area of the Ob Natural Park, one of the main strongholds for the species, and a group of hunters were found with at least one ibis in April 2011 (R. Grimmett in litt.
2011). Plans to develop coffee plantations and restore and extend 630 ha of abandoned palm-oil plantations (to cover more than 2,000 ha; ready for harvest in 2013) in the vicinity of the core zone of Ob Natural Park and encroaching into its buffer zone
(J. Tavares in litt
2010) may result in the loss of suitable habitat and potentially have both positive and negative influences on levels of disturbance (Olmos and Turshak 2010). The palm-oil project, however, reportedly incorporates the protection of some primary and mature secondary forest (J. Tavares in litt
2010). Road developments along the east and west coasts are increasing access to previously remote areas (A. Gascoigne in litt.
2000). Introduced black rat Rattus rattus
, mona monkey Cercopithecus mona
, African civet Civettictis civetta
and weasel Mustela nivalis
are all potential predators. In particular, recent reports suggest mona monkeys may be having a serious impact on productivity. Conservation Actions Underway
Primary forest is protected as a zona ecologica
and in the 295-km2
Ob Natural Park, although there is no law enforcement within these areas. The park was established in 1992, but was not protected by law until 2006, and although a zoning and management plan was being developed in 2008, when the first directors were appointed, the park was still lacking sufficient personnel (Olmos and Turshak 2010)
. A law providing for the gazetting of protected areas and the protection of threatened species has been ratified (M. Melo in litt
. In 2008, a training programme with NGOs Associao de Bilogos Saotomenses (ABS) and Monte Pico was initiated to involve locals in the study and conservation of So Tomean species, and this has since been achieved (Associao dos Bilogos Santomenses in litt
. Research is currently being carried out into the effects of agroforestry and the exploitation of wildlife resources on the island (del Hoyo et al
Borrow and Demey 2001)
. As part of the BirdLife International Preventing Extinctions programme, the Species Guardian ABS has begun training local community members in the implementation of site-based conservation; implementing an awareness raising campaign and carrying out field research and monitoring into the ecology, population status and threats to the species (BirdLife International 2008)
. During an international workshop held in February 2008 to promote ecotourism in So Tom e Prncipe, birdwatching was listed as an activity that should be encouraged and Ribeira Peixe was identified as a suitable site for a pilot project (Olmos and Turshak 2010)
. In July 2009, ABS promoted a short course for the training of local people as bird guides at Ribeira Peixe and efforts were on-going to promote the conservation of the area (Olmos and Turshak 2010)
. Conservation Actions Proposed
Advocacy and awareness raising for species and primary forest protection in So Tom. Identification of key sites and training of staff to ensure their protection. Field research on Dwarf Olive Ibis (to improve knowledge on ecology, status and threats) and mapping of protection zone for the species. Formulate species conservation measures based on research findings and seek wider involvement in their implementation. Ensure legal protection of all remaining lowland primary forest. List it as a protected species under national law and consider establishing a captive-breeding programme.
Atkinson, P.; Peet, N.; Alexander, J. 1991. The status and conservation of the endemic bird species of Sao Tomé and Príncipe, West Africa. Bird Conservation International 1: 255-282.
BirdLife International. 2008. Species Guardian Action Update: November 2008: Dwarf Olive Ibis Bostrichia bocagei, São Tomé Fiscal Lanius newtoni, São Tomé Grosbeak Neospiza concolor. Available at: #http://www.birdlife.org/extinction/pdfs/Sao_Tome_Endemics_Guardian_Action.pdf#.
Borrow, N.; Demey, R. 2001. Birds of western Africa. Christopher Helm, London.
Christy, P.; Clarke, W. V. 1998. Guide des Oiseaux de Sao Tome et Principe. ECOFAC, Sao Tome.
Collar, N. J.; Butchart, S. H. M. 2013. Conservation breeding and avian diversity: chances and challenges. International Zoo Yearbook.
del Hoyo, J.; Elliot, A.; Sargatal, J. 1992. Handbook of the Birds of the World, vol. 1: Ostrich to Ducks. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain.
Olmos, F.; Turshak, L. 2007. Final report on the fact-finding trip to Angola and Sao Tome and Principe July-August 2007..
Further web sources of information
Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE) species/site profile. This species has been identified as an AZE trigger due to its IUCN Red List status and limited range.
Click here for more information about the Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE)
Species Guardian Action Update
Text account compilers
Bird, J., Butchart, S., Ekstrom, J., Pilgrim, J., Symes, A., Taylor, J., Allinson, T
Carvalho, M., Gascoigne, A., Melo, M., d'Assis Lima, S., de Lima, R.
BirdLife International (2013) Species factsheet: Bostrychia bocagei. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 13/12/2013.
Recommended citation for factsheets for more than one species: BirdLife International (2013) IUCN Red List for birds. Downloaded from
http://www.birdlife.org on 13/12/2013.
This information is based upon, and updates, the information published in BirdLife International (2000)
Threatened birds of the world. Barcelona and Cambridge, UK: Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, BirdLife International (2004)
Threatened birds of the world 2004 CD-ROM and BirdLife International (2008) Threatened birds of the world 2008 CD-ROM. These sources provide the information for species accounts for the birds on the IUCN Red List.
To provide new information to update this factsheet or to correct any errors, please email BirdLife
To contribute to discussions on the evaluation of the IUCN Red List status of Globally Threatened Birds, please visit BirdLife's Globally Threatened Bird Forums.
Additional resources for this species