Search | Tips
Home
About BirdLife
Our Vision
Global Overview
BirdLife Finances
BirdLife Partnership
Regional Work
Africa
Americas
Caribbean
Asia
Europe
Middle East
Pacific
Antarctica
News
Features
Press Releases
Video
Subscribe
News Archive Search
Global Programmes
Climate Change
Seabirds
Flyways
Preventing Extinctions
Forests of Hope
Action
Action Index
Campaigns
Conservation Science
Action on the Ground
Advocating Change
BirdLife & Business
Developing Capacity
Building Awareness
Publications
World Birdwatch
Books
BCI
Help BirdLife
Donate
Fundraise
Give a Legacy
Join BirdLife
Support a Campaign
Surf the Web
Data Zone
Search Species
Search Sites
Search EBAs
State of Birds
Threatened bird ofthe day: Feb 9, 2010 Imperial Amazon Amazona imperialis
In this Section
Search for Species
Species Information
Terms & Definitions
Taxonomy
References A-L
References M-Z
See Also
Nepal drug boost for vultures
India bans production and sale of vulture ...
Rarest vultures join breeding programme
Wind farm causes eagle deaths
BirdLife hopeful of diclofenac ban
What's New (2009)
Species facts & figures
Global Species Programme
The BirdLife checklist of the birds of the world with conservation status and taxonomic sources. Version 2 [.zip, 1.5mb]
Related Sites
International Year of Biodiversity
IUCN species of the day
Lynx Edicions
Threatened Birds of the World - Buy online
Printer friendly view
Subscribe to News
Bookmark & Share
Change Language
Home > Data Zone >
Justification This species is classified as Critically Endangered because it has an extremely small known population, in areas where habitat loss is continuing rapidly. It is currently known from seven sites within a small range, but these are severely fragmented.
Family/Sub-family Accipitridae
Species name author (Swann, 1922)
Taxonomic source(s) SACC (2005 + updates), Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993), Stotz et al. (1996)
Taxonomic note Leptodon cayanensis and L. forbesi (Sibley and Monroe 1990, 1993) are currently retained as separate species contra SACC (2005) who include forbesi as a subspecies of L. cayanensis, pending the outcome of investigation by SACC.
Identification 50 cm. Large, mostly bicoloured kite. Overall white head (pearl grey crown and sides of head hard to notice in the field). Blackish above with white feather tips on the mantle, scapullars, secondaries, and inner primaries. White below. White underwing-coverts and white leading edge of the wings are both very noticeable in the field and diagnostic. Tail ashy-white with black subterminal band and whitish tip. Some birds present two black bands in the undertail. Similar spp. Very similar to more widely distributed Grey-headed Kite L. cayanensis from which differs on white head and leading edge to wings and white underwing coverts. Light-morph, juvenile Grey-headeds are browner above and have black crowns (grey in intermediate stages of first pre-basic moult), and feathers in the upperside have dark tips. In White-necked Hawk Leucopternis lacernulatus primaries reach tail tip on perched birds. They soar in a strong dihedral and show a dark band on the trailing edge to the wings. Mantled Hawk Leucopternis polionotus have shorter tails almost completely white, and broader, more pointed wings show a noticeable white trailing edge. Ubiquitous Short-tailed Hawk Buteo brachyurus have pointed wings and multi-banded tail pattern. Wings reach tail tip in perched birds, and the sides of the head are slate-coloured. Voice A series of short kua-kua-kua-kua calls (approx. 4 per sec)
Population estimate
Population trend
Range estimate (breeding/resident)
Country endemic?
50-249
decreasing
40 km2
Yes
Range & population Leptodon forbesi occurs in Pernambuco (one specimen taken in 18805 and recent records from Água Azul, Barreiros and Trapiche8,9,10) and Alagoas (recent records from São Miguel dos Campos, Serra Grande and Murici6,9,), north-east Brazil. It was recorded from all six sites surveyed in 2007, with a total estimate of 21 pairs logged9. However, as survey effort focused on a small fraction of all forest fragments the global population can conservatively be estimated at c.50 pairs9. The extent of habitat loss indicates that there must have been significant declines in both numbers and range. Forest cover has been reduced to less than 1% of its former distribution within this species's range. The largest remaining forest fragments in Pernambuco and Alagoas are 45 km2 and 30 km2 respectively, suggesting the species is in a precarious position.
Important Bird Areas Click here to view map showing IBAs where species is recorded and triggers any of the IBA criteria.
Ecology: It apparently inhabits humid forest at elevations up to c.600 m, but there are no data on its feeding or breeding ecology1,3,6.
Threats There has been massive deforestation in coastal Alagoas and Pernambuco, with most suitable habitat cleared or threatened. The two key sites in Alagoas are both under severe threat, with forest at Murici covering 70 km2 in the 1970s, but less than 30 km2 in 19992. Indiscriminate small-scale logging was still occurring at the site in 1992, and the area is further threatened by fires spreading from adjacent sugarcane plantations. Some forest persists at São Miguel dos Campos but it is still under pressure from logging and hunting9. The current condition of forest at Água Azul is unknown.
Conservation measures underway CITES Appendix II. A large area in Murici, Alagoas, is currently legally protected by the Brazilian government9. Surveys were conducted in Alagoas and Pernambuco states in 20079. Local NGOs such as the IPMA (Instituto para a Preservação da Mata Atlântica) are working to create reserves in many privately-owned forest fragments in Alagoas and Pernambuco9.
Conservation measures proposed Urgently survey all forest patches larger than 10 ha in Pernambuco and Alagoas. Designate Murici as a biological reserve and ensure its de facto protection. Protect any remaining forest at São Miguel dos Campos. Conduct field and museum studies to clarify its taxonomic status including DNA analysis. Conduct prospective surveys in forest fragments in Paraíba and Sergipe states as the species may also occur there.
References 1. Bierregard (1994). 2. J. M. Goerck in litt. (1999, 2000). 3. Parker et al. (1996). 4. Sibley and Monroe (1990). 5. Swann (1922). 6. Teixeira et al. (1987). 7. Wege and Long (1995). 8. E. O. Willis in litt. (1999). 9. F. V. Dénes and L. F. Silveira in litt. (2007). 10. Pereira et al. (2006).
Text account compilers Phil Benstead (BirdLife International), Jeremy Bird (BirdLife International), Stuart Butchart (BirdLife International), David Capper (BirdLife International), Andy Symes (BirdLife International)
Contributors Francisco Voeroes Dénes (University of São Paulo), Pedro Develey (SAVE Brasil), J. M. Goerck (SAVE Brasil), Luís Fábio Silveira (University of São Paulo), Bret Whitney (Louisiana State University), E. O. Willis
IUCN Red List evaluators Jeremy Bird (BirdLife International), Stuart Butchart (BirdLife International), Andy Symes (BirdLife International)
Recommended citation BirdLife International (2009) Species factsheet: Leptodon forbesi. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 9/2/2010
This information is based upon, and updates, the information published in BirdLife International (2000) Threatened birds of the world. Barcelona and Cambridge, UK: Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004 CD-ROM and BirdLife International (2008) Threatened birds of the world 2008 CD-ROM. These sources provide the information for species accounts for the birds on the IUCN Red List.
To provide new information to update this factsheet or to correct any errors, please email BirdLife
To contribute to discussions on the evaluation of the IUCN Red List status of Globally Threatened Birds, please visit BirdLife's Globally Threatened Bird Forums
Advertising more »
Contact Us | Feedback | Jobs | Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions
© 2010 BirdLife International. Working together for birds and people.