Search | Tips
Home
About BirdLife
Our Vision
Global Overview
BirdLife Finances
BirdLife Partnership
Regional Work
Africa
Americas
Caribbean
Asia
Europe
Middle East
Pacific
Antarctica
News
Features
Press Releases
Video
Subscribe
News Archive Search
Global Programmes
Climate Change
Seabirds
Flyways
Preventing Extinctions
Forests of Hope
Action
Action Index
Campaigns
Conservation Science
Action on the Ground
Advocating Change
BirdLife & Business
Developing Capacity
Building Awareness
Publications
World Birdwatch
Books
BCI
Help BirdLife
Donate
Fundraise
Give a Legacy
Join BirdLife
Support a Campaign
Surf the Web
Data Zone
Search Species
Search Sites
Search EBAs
State of Birds
Threatened bird ofthe day: Feb 9, 2010 Imperial Amazon Amazona imperialis
In this Section
Search for Species
Species Information
Terms & Definitions
Taxonomy
References A-L
References M-Z
See Also
Pink-headed blank
First teal ducklings on Campbell Island
Ferruginous Duck breeds in Cyprus
SPEA campaigns for lead ban
Lesser White-front is back from Baghdad
What's New (2009)
Species facts & figures
Global Species Programme
The BirdLife checklist of the birds of the world with conservation status and taxonomic sources. Version 2 [.zip, 1.5mb]
Related Sites
International Year of Biodiversity
IUCN species of the day
Lynx Edicions
Threatened Birds of the World - Buy online
Printer friendly view
Subscribe to News
Bookmark & Share
Change Language
Home > Data Zone >
Justification This species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence <20,000 km2 combined with a declining or fluctuating range size, habitat extent/quality, or population size and a small number of locations or severe fragmentation). Despite the fact that the population trend appears to be decreasing, the decline is not believed to be sufficiently rapid to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (>30% decline over ten years or three generations). The population size is extremely large, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (<10,000 mature individuals with a continuing decline estimated to be >10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern.
Family/Sub-family Anatidae
Species name author Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic source(s) AERC TAC (2003), AOU checklist (1998 + supplements), Christidis and Boles (1994), Cramp and Simmons (1977-1994), Dowsett and Forbes-Watson (1993), Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993), Stotz et al. (1996), Turbott (1990)
Taxonomic note Anas platyrhynchos (Sibley and Monroe 1990, 1993) was provisionally split into A. platyrhynchos and A. diazi by Stotz et al. (1996) but this treatment has not been adopted, following SACC (2005).
Population estimate
Population trend
Range estimate (breeding/resident)
Country endemic?
19,000,000
unset
36,100,000 km2
No
Important Bird Areas Click here to view map showing IBAs where species is recorded and triggers any of the IBA criteria.
Ecology: Behaviour In temperate regions breeding populations of this species are sedentary or dispersive, often making local movements during severe weather5. Other populations are fully migratory2 with females and juveniles leaving the breeding grounds in the western Palearctic from September and returning as early as February5. The species breeds between March and June3 in single pairs or loose groups1 although the exact timing varies with latitude3. While the females are incubating4 (from mid-May)5, 6 the males gather3 in small flocks and migrate to moulting areas6 where they undergo a flightless moulting period lasting for c.4 weeks5 (females moult near the breeding grounds)6. Outside of the breeding season the species can be found in small to very large flocks3 numbering up to several hundreds or even thousands of individuals7 especially when moulting5, on migration7 and during the winter2. The species may also roost both nocturnally and diurnally in communal groups when not breeding8. Habitat The species occurs in almost every wetland type1 although it generally avoids fast-flowing, oligotrophic1, 5, 7, deep, exposed, rough, rockbound waters and hard unvegetated areas such as rocky ground, sand dunes and artificial surfacing7. It requires water less than 1 m deep for foraging7 and shows a preference for freshwater habitats3 although it may frequent shallow brackish waters as long as they provide the cover1, 5 of submerged, floating, emergent or riparian vegetation, dense reedbeds or overhanging branches7. Habitats commonly frequented include flooded swampy woodlands, seasonal floodlands7, wet grassy swamps and meadows, oxbow lakes6, open waters with mudflats, banks or spits, irrigation networks, reservoirs, ornamental waters1, 5, 7, canals and sewage farms7. During the winter the species may also be found in saline habitats along the coast3 where water is shallow, fairly sheltered and within site of land7 (e.g. brackish lagoons7, brackish estuaries1, 7 and bays1). Diet The species is omnivorous and opportunistic1, 7, feeding by dabbling in water and by grazing on the land7. Its diet consists of seeds and the vegetative parts of aquatic and terrestrial plants (e.g. crops)1, as well as terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates (especially in the spring and summer) such as insects, molluscs, crustaceans, worms and occasionally amphibians and fish1. Breeding site The nest is a shallow depression7 or bowl of vegetation that can be situated in many different locations such as within vegetation on the ground, in natural tree cavities1 up to 10 m high (Africa)8, under fallen dead wood, on tree stumps6, under bushes8 and even in abandoned nests of other species (e.g. herons or crows)6. Nests are generally placed close to water2 although occasionally they may be some distance away3. Management information "Extensive" grazing of wetland grasslands (c.0.5 cows per hectare) was found to attract a higher abundance of the species in Hungary19. Studies in Danish coastal wetlands found that the spatial restriction of shore-based shooting was more successful at maintaining waterfowl population sizes than was the temporal restriction of shooting, and therefore that wildfowl reserves should incorporate shooting-free refuges that include adjacent marshland in order to ensure high waterfowl species diversity20. The cyclical removal of adult fish from an artificial waterbody (gravel pit) in the UK resulted in an increase in invertebrate food availability and an increase in the growth of submerged aquatic macrophytes, which in turn led to an increased use of the habitat for brood rearing by the species26. The removed fish (dead or alive) were sold to generate funds26. The species will also nest in artificial nest boxes1, 8.
Threats The species is threatened by wetland habitat degradation and loss from pollution (e.g. petroleum9 and pesticide pollution22), wetland drainage, peat-extraction, changing wetland management practices (e.g. decreased grazing and mowing in meadows leading to scrub over-growth) and the burning and mowing of reedbeds9. The species also suffers mortality as a result of lead shot ingestion (e.g. in Spain21 and France24) and poisoning from white phosphorous ingestion (from firearms) in Alaska18. It is also susceptible to duck virus enteritis (DVE)10, avian influenza12 and avian botulism11 so may be threatened by future outbreaks of these diseases (although it may be able to withstand sporadic losses due to its high reproductive potential)11. The species is predated by American mink Neovison vison in Europe25. Utilisation The species is hunted throughout the world2 mainly for sport13, 14, 15, 17, but also for commercial use (food)16. The eggs of this species were (and possibly still are) harvested in Iceland23.
References 1. del Hoyo et al. (1992). 2. Kear (2005b). 3. Madge and Burn (1988). 4. Johnsgard (1978). 5. Scott and Rose (1996). 6. Flint et al. (1984). 7. Snow and Perrins (1998). 8. Brown et al. (1982). 9. Grishanov (2006). 10. Friend (2006). 11. Rocke (2006). 12. Melville and Shortridge (2006).13. Bregnballe et al. (2006). 14. Mondain-Monval et al. (2006). 15. Sorrenti et al. (2006). 16. Balmaki and Barati (2006). 17. Evans and Day (2002). 18. Steele (1997). 19. Baldi et al.(2005). 20. Bregnballe et al. (2004). 21. Mateo et al. (1999). 22. Kwon et al. (2004). 23. Gudmundsson (1979). 24. Mondain-Monval et al. (2002). 25. Opermanis et al. (2001). 26. Giles (1994).
Further web sources of information
Detailed species account from Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status (BirdLife International 2004)
Text account compilers Stuart Butchart (BirdLife International), Jonathan Ekstrom (BirdLife International), Lucy Malpas (BirdLife International)
IUCN Red List evaluators Jeremy Bird (BirdLife International), Stuart Butchart (BirdLife International)
Recommended citation BirdLife International (2009) Species factsheet: Anas platyrhynchos. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 9/2/2010
This information is based upon, and updates, the information published in BirdLife International (2000) Threatened birds of the world. Barcelona and Cambridge, UK: Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004 CD-ROM and BirdLife International (2008) Threatened birds of the world 2008 CD-ROM. These sources provide the information for species accounts for the birds on the IUCN Red List.
To provide new information to update this factsheet or to correct any errors, please email BirdLife
To contribute to discussions on the evaluation of the IUCN Red List status of Globally Threatened Birds, please visit BirdLife's Globally Threatened Bird Forums
Advertising more »
Contact Us | Feedback | Jobs | Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions
© 2010 BirdLife International. Working together for birds and people.