Search | Tips
Home
About BirdLife
Our Vision
Global Overview
BirdLife Finances
BirdLife Partnership
Regional Work
Africa
Americas
Caribbean
Asia
Europe
Middle East
Pacific
Antarctica
News
Top Stories
Community News
News Posts
Blog Posts
Video Posts
Subscribe
Top Story Search
Global Programmes
Climate Change
Seabirds
Flyways
Preventing Extinctions
Forests of Hope
IBAs
Action
Action Index
Campaigns
Conservation Science
Action on the Ground
Advocating Change
BirdLife & Business
Developing Capacity
Building Awareness
Publications
World Birdwatch
Books
BCI
Help BirdLife
Donate
Fundraise
Give a Legacy
Join BirdLife
Support a Campaign
Surf the Web
Data Zone
Search Species
Search Sites
Search EBAs
State of Birds
Threatened bird ofthe day: Sep 9, 2010 Hainan Leaf-warbler Phylloscopus hainanus
In this Section
Search for Species
Species Information
Terms & Definitions
Taxonomy
References
See Also
What's New (2010)
Species facts & figures
Global Species Programme
The BirdLife checklist of the birds of the world with conservation status and taxonomic sources. Version 3 (Zip, 1.7 MB)
Related Sites
International Year of Biodiversity
IUCN species of the day
Lynx Edicions
Threatened Birds of the World - Buy online
Printer friendly view
Subscribe to News
Bookmark & Share
Change Language
Home > Data Zone >
Justification This species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence <20,000 km2 combined with a declining or fluctuating range size, habitat extent/quality, or population size and a small number of locations or severe fragmentation). Despite the fact that the population trend appears to be decreasing, the decline is not believed to be sufficiently rapid to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (>30% decline over ten years or three generations). The population size is very large, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (<10,000 mature individuals with a continuing decline estimated to be >10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern.
Family/Sub-family Ardeidae
Species name author (Linnaeus, 1758)
Taxonomic source(s) AERC TAC (2003), Cramp and Simmons (1977-1994), Dowsett and Forbes-Watson (1993), Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993)
Population estimate
Population trend
Range estimate (breeding/resident)
Country endemic?
110,000 - 340,000
unset
18,100,000 km2
No
Important Bird Areas Click here to view map showing IBAs where species is recorded and triggers any of the IBA criteria.
Ecology: Behaviour Populations breeding on the Atlantic coast of Europe, in the Mediterranean and in South Africa are largely sedentary due to the relatively mild winters6 (although they may make local dispersive movements related to rainfall)4. Continental populations are mainly migratory however2, 6 with a marked post-breeding dispersal of immatures2. The species breeds from March to June in Eurasia and during the rains from September to January in South Africa1. It usually nests solitarily although males are polygamous and may mate with up to five females nesting on a large wetland site1. The species remains solitary throughout the year1 (although migratory individuals may travel in small flocks)2, and is mainly crepuscular in its activities2. Habitat Breeding The species has highly restrictive breeding habitat requirements1. It shows a strong preference for quiet lowland marshes around lakes and rivers (less than 200 m above sea-level)2 with extensive dense young reedbeds of Phragmites spp. (e.g. with 1- 3 years worth of new growth3, 11 but still maintaining some old or dead stems1) that are flooded but are fairly shallow1 (less than 30 cm deep)6, have few fluctuations in water-level1, have low acidity2 and are surrounded by clear open areas1 of deeper water is maintained into the driest part of the breeding season8. Breeding adults are more attracted to unfragmented11 reedbeds over 20 ha in area, although smaller sites with networks of reed-fringed waterways or open wetland habitats with a number of small reedbeds6 (greater than 100 m)8 over a wide area may also be used6. The species avoids saline waters2 but is equally abundant in fresh or brackish habitats1 (e.g. in estuarine or delta marshes)5, and may occasionally nest in stands of rushes Scirpus spp.1 or Papyrus spp. if reeds are unavailable2. Non-breeding The species frequents a more varied range of habitats outside of breeding season, foraging on rice-fields, watercress beds, gravel pits, fish farms, ditches, sewage farms1, small ponds and wet grassy areas2 as well as marshes and reedbeds1. It also forages in running water (e.g. streams) when still waterbodies freeze during the winter4. Diet Its diet varies depending on the site and season although it predominantly takes fish (particularly cyprinids and eels) and amphibians as well as adult and larval insects, spiders, crustaceans, molluscs, snakes, lizards, birds, nestlings and small mammals1. Breeding site The nest is a pad of reeds and other vegetation2 constructed close to or floating on water1 amidst dense reedbeds1, 2. Although it is a solitary nester, breeding densities from 2 per 100 ha to 100 per 100 ha may occur depending on the quality of the habitat2, nests sometimes being placed close together in areas where the species is particularly numerous4. Management information Breeding adults in Europe may be more attracted to unfragmented11 reedbeds over 20 ha in area, although smaller sites with networks of reed-fringed waterways or open wetland habitats with a number of small reedbeds over a wide area may also be used6. There is evidence that females in Britain preferentially nest in locations surrounded by less scrub but more vegetated open water, with a higher proportion of Phragmites spp. than other plant species, and in areas where deeper water is maintained into the driest part of the breeding season8. The European Action Plan for this species recommends raising water levels, harvesting and burning reeds, cutting invasive scrub, or digging out reedbeds on a rotational compartmental basis as methods of slowing reedbed succession6. It also recommends the regular cutting of small areas of reedbed to maintain Phragmites spp. monocultures6, to provide a range of multi-age reed stands2 and to favour the retention of water levels in spring and summer (promoting rapid growth, preventing a build-up of reed litter and providing foraging sites)6. Large-scale reed cutting should be prohibited in the late-winter however2. Wetlands should also be managed to enhance the carrying capacity of fish and eel populations (thus increasing food resources for bitterns)7, 9, 10. In Britain it was found that suitable habitats should be provided for all fish life stages (including spawning, refuge and overwintering), the movement of fish throughout reedbeds should be promoted (e.g. by changes in hydrological management regimes and sluice design)7 and issues relating to water quality, zooplankton and macrophyte community structures should be addressed10.
Threats The species is threatened mainly by the loss of Phragmites reed marshes2 owing to habitat alteration through drainage2, direct destruction1, changes in traditional management (e.g. changes to reed harvesting regimes)3, sea level rise and salt water intrusion6, the effects of wave action from boat traffic at the edge of open water3, and pollution1, 3 (either eutrophication which modifies fish populations within reedbeds or pesticides which may reduce the species's survival)3. Disturbance from humans during the nesting period is also a threat2, 3, 6 (e.g. disturbance from reed cutting2, noisy recreation and water-sports2, 3, 6, motor vehicles and hunting2). The hunting of adults and collecting of eggs and chicks still occurs in some areas1, and the species may suffer high mortalities in very cold winters (especially in sedentary populations)3.
References 1. del Hoyo et al. (1992). 2. Kushan and Hancock (2005). 3. Marion et al. (2000). 4. Hancock and Kushlan (1984). 5. Snow and Perrins (1998). 6. Newbery et al. (1996). 7. Noble et al. (2004). 8. Gilbert et al. (2005). 9. Gilbert et al. (2007). 10. Self (2005). 11. Puglisi et al. (2005).
Further web sources of information
Detailed species account from Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status (BirdLife International 2004)
European Union Species Action Plan
Text account compilers Stuart Butchart (BirdLife International), Jonathan Ekstrom (BirdLife International), Lucy Malpas (BirdLife International)
IUCN Red List evaluators Jeremy Bird (BirdLife International), Stuart Butchart (BirdLife International)
Recommended citation BirdLife International (2010) Species factsheet: Botaurus stellaris. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 9/9/2010
This information is based upon, and updates, the information published in BirdLife International (2000) Threatened birds of the world. Barcelona and Cambridge, UK: Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004 CD-ROM and BirdLife International (2008) Threatened birds of the world 2008 CD-ROM. These sources provide the information for species accounts for the birds on the IUCN Red List.
To provide new information to update this factsheet or to correct any errors, please email BirdLife
To contribute to discussions on the evaluation of the IUCN Red List status of Globally Threatened Birds, please visit BirdLife's Globally Threatened Bird Forums
Advertising more »
Contact Us | Feedback | Jobs | Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions
© 2010 BirdLife International. Working together for birds and people.