Search | Tips
Home
About BirdLife
Our Vision
Global Overview
BirdLife Finances
BirdLife Partnership
Regional Work
Africa
Americas
Caribbean
Asia
Europe
Middle East
Pacific
Antarctica
News
Top Stories
Community News
News Posts
Blog Posts
Video Posts
Subscribe
Top Story Search
Global Programmes
Climate Change
Seabirds
Flyways
Preventing Extinctions
Forests of Hope
IBAs
Action
Action Index
Campaigns
Conservation Science
Action on the Ground
Advocating Change
BirdLife & Business
Developing Capacity
Building Awareness
Publications
World Birdwatch
Books
BCI
Help BirdLife
Donate
Fundraise
Give a Legacy
Join BirdLife
Support a Campaign
Surf the Web
Data Zone
Search Species
Search Sites
Search EBAs
State of Birds
Threatened bird ofthe day: Sep 6, 2010 Zapata Rail Cyanolimnas cerverai
In this Section
Search for Species
Species Information
Terms & Definitions
Taxonomy
References
See Also
Zeebrugge harbour bar is best for Sandwiches
Belgian terns go online!
What's New (2010)
Species facts & figures
Global Species Programme
The BirdLife checklist of the birds of the world with conservation status and taxonomic sources. Version 3 (Zip, 1.7 MB)
Related Sites
International Year of Biodiversity
IUCN species of the day
Lynx Edicions
Threatened Birds of the World - Buy online
Printer friendly view
Subscribe to News
Bookmark & Share
Change Language
Home > Data Zone >
Justification This species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence <20,000 km2 combined with a declining or fluctuating range size, habitat extent/quality, or population size and a small number of locations or severe fragmentation). Despite the fact that the population trend appears to be decreasing, the decline is not believed to be sufficiently rapid to approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population trend criterion (>30% decline over ten years or three generations). The population size is extremely large, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (<10,000 mature individuals with a continuing decline estimated to be >10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern.
Family/Sub-family Laridae
Species name author Linnaeus, 1766
Taxonomic source(s) AERC TAC (2003), AOU checklist (1998 + supplements), Christidis and Boles (1994), Christidis and Boles (2008), Cramp and Simmons (1977-1994), Dowsett and Forbes-Watson (1993), Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993), Stotz et al. (1996)
Synonyms Chroicocephalus ridibundus Christidis and Boles (2008)
Population estimate
Population trend
Range estimate (breeding/resident)
Country endemic?
4,800,000 - 8,900,000
unset
-
No
Range & population The Black-headed Gull breeds in north-east North America and across much of Europe and Asia, excluding the north of each continent (northern Scandinavia and north Russia), and south Asia. Some populations in North America and the milder areas of Europe are resident, with the remaining populations wintering to the south over a large range, encompassing much of the southern coast of Asia and Europe, and the central and northern coast of Africa1.
Important Bird Areas Click here to view map showing IBAs where species is recorded and triggers any of the IBA criteria.
Ecology: Behaviour Northern breeding populations of this species are strongly migratory although populations at lower latitudes tend to be sedentary or locally dispersive1. The species breeds between April and May1 in dense colonies of up to several thousand pairs1, 4 often with other gull or tern species3. It generally remains gregarious throughout the year4 and may roost in large flocks during the winter2. Habitat Breeding The species chiefly breeds inland and shows a preference for shallow, calm4, temporarily flooded wetland habitats1 with lush vegetation1, 3. It forms nesting colonies on the margins of lakes1, 2, 3, lagoons3, 4, slow-flowing rivers, deltas, estuaries4 and on tussocky marshes1, 2, 3, but may also nest on the upper zones of saltmarshes1, 4, coastal dunes and offshore islands in more coastal areas1. The species will also utilise artificial sites such as sewage ponds, gravel- and clay-pits, ponds, canals and floodlands4 and may nest on the dry ground of heather moors, sand-dunes, beaches1, 4 and stony islets4. Non-breeding During the winter the species is most common in coastal habitats1 and tidal inshore waters, showing a preference for inlets or estuaries with sandy or muddy beaches, and generally avoiding rocky or exposed coastlines4. It may also occur inland during this season, frequenting ploughed fields, moist grasslands, urban parks, sewage farms, refuse tips, reservoirs, ponds and ornamental waters4, and roosts on sandy and gravel sites or on inland reservoirs2. Diet Its diet consists predominantly of aquatic and terrestrial insects, earthworms and marine invertebrates (e.g. molluscs, crustaceans and marine worms)1 although it may also take fish1 (usually dead or sick)3, rodents (e.g. voles)3 and agricultural grain1. During the non-breeding season the species may rely heavily on artificial food sources provided by man, especially in Western Europe1, and often scavenges from refuse tips during this period2. Breeding site The nest is a rough construction of vegetation2 based on a shallow scrape4 and placed on a floating mat, in broken reeds, on a hummock, or sometimes on dry, grassy or sandy ground1, 3. The species shows a strong preference for nesting near vegetation (although vegetation overgrowth can lead to the desertion of colony sites)1. It usually nests in dense colonies with neighbouring nests placed an average of 1 m apart1.
Threats The species is susceptible to avian influenza5 and avian botulism so may be threatened by future outbreaks of these diseases6. It may also be threatened by future coastal oil spills7 and has suffered local population declines in the past as a result of egg collecting1. In some areas of its breeding range the species may also suffer from reduced reproductive successes due to contamination with chemical pollutants1.
References 1. del Hoyo et al. (1996). 2. Richards (1990). 3. Flint et al. (1984). 4. Snow and Perrins (1998). 5. Melville and Shortridge (2006). 6. Hubalek et al. (2005). 7. Gorski et al. (1977).
Further web sources of information
Detailed species account from Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status (BirdLife International 2004)
Text account compilers Stuart Butchart (BirdLife International), Rob Calvert (BirdLife International), Jonathan Ekstrom (BirdLife International), Lucy Malpas (BirdLife International)
IUCN Red List evaluators Jeremy Bird (BirdLife International), Stuart Butchart (BirdLife International)
Recommended citation BirdLife International (2010) Species factsheet: Larus ridibundus. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 6/9/2010
This information is based upon, and updates, the information published in BirdLife International (2000) Threatened birds of the world. Barcelona and Cambridge, UK: Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004 CD-ROM and BirdLife International (2008) Threatened birds of the world 2008 CD-ROM. These sources provide the information for species accounts for the birds on the IUCN Red List.
To provide new information to update this factsheet or to correct any errors, please email BirdLife
To contribute to discussions on the evaluation of the IUCN Red List status of Globally Threatened Birds, please visit BirdLife's Globally Threatened Bird Forums
Advertising more »
Contact Us | Feedback | Jobs | Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions
© 2010 BirdLife International. Working together for birds and people.