Search | Tips
Home
About BirdLife
Our Vision
Global Overview
BirdLife Finances
BirdLife Partnership
Regional Work
Africa
Americas
Caribbean
Asia
Europe
Middle East
Pacific
Antarctica
News
Features
Press Releases
Video
Subscribe
News Archive Search
Global Programmes
Climate Change
Seabirds
Flyways
Preventing Extinctions
Forests of Hope
Action
Action Index
Campaigns
Conservation Science
Action on the Ground
Advocating Change
BirdLife & Business
Developing Capacity
Building Awareness
Publications
World Birdwatch
Books
BCI
Help BirdLife
Donate
Fundraise
Give a Legacy
Join BirdLife
Support a Campaign
Surf the Web
Data Zone
Search Species
Search Sites
Search EBAs
State of Birds
Threatened bird ofthe day: Feb 10, 2010 Taliabu Masked-owl Tyto nigrobrunnea
In this Section
Search for Species
Species Information
Terms & Definitions
Taxonomy
References A-L
References M-Z
See Also
Pink-headed blank
First teal ducklings on Campbell Island
Ferruginous Duck breeds in Cyprus
SPEA campaigns for lead ban
Lesser White-front is back from Baghdad
What's New (2009)
Species facts & figures
Global Species Programme
The BirdLife checklist of the birds of the world with conservation status and taxonomic sources. Version 2 [.zip, 1.5mb]
Related Sites
International Year of Biodiversity
IUCN species of the day
Lynx Edicions
Threatened Birds of the World - Buy online
Printer friendly view
Subscribe to News
Bookmark & Share
Change Language
Home > Data Zone >
Justification This species has an extremely large range, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the range size criterion (Extent of Occurrence <20,000 km2 combined with a declining or fluctuating range size, habitat extent/quality, or population size and a small number of locations or severe fragmentation). The population trend is not known, but the population is not believed to be decreasing sufficiently rapidly to approach the thresholds under the population trend criterion (>30% decline over ten years or three generations). The population size is extremely large, and hence does not approach the thresholds for Vulnerable under the population size criterion (<10,000 mature individuals with a continuing decline estimated to be >10% in ten years or three generations, or with a specified population structure). For these reasons the species is evaluated as Least Concern.
Family/Sub-family Anatidae
Species name author Linnaeus, 1758
Taxonomic source(s) AOU checklist (1998 + supplements), Cramp and Simmons (1977-1994), Dowsett and Forbes-Watson (1993), SACC (2005 + updates), Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993), Stotz et al. (1996)
Taxonomic note Although Anas crecca was split by Sangster et al. (2001) into A. crecca and A. carolinensis and this treatment was followed in BirdLife International (2004), AOU (1998) do not adopt this treatment and this source is now followed here.
Population estimate
Population trend
Range estimate (breeding/resident)
Country endemic?
5,900,000 - 6,900,000
unset
31,800,000 km2
No
Important Bird Areas Click here to view map showing IBAs where species is recorded and triggers any of the IBA criteria.
Ecology: Behaviour Northern breeding populations of this species are highly migratory3 although populations in more temperate regions are sedentary1 or locally dispersive5. The species breeds from May onwards3 in single pairs or loose groups1. Once females have started incubating2 (from June or early-July)5 males congregate2 and undertake extensive moult migrations or remain near the breeding grounds3 to undergo a flightless moulting period lasting for c.4 weeks5 (the females moult on the breeding grounds)3. After the post-breeding moult migratory populations of the species migrate south, the peak of the autumn migration occurring between October and November5. It returns to the breeding areas from late-February onwards (peaking March-April)5. Outside of the breeding season the species forms large concentrations, with large flocks of 30-40 and sometimes hundreds of individuals gathering at winter roosting sites3, 6. The species forages at night during the winter (especially during the hunting season) but forages by day during the breeding season2. Habitat Breeding The species shows a preference for shallow2, 3 permanent waters4 in the breeding season3, 7, especially those in the vicinity of woodlands with fairly dense herbaceous cover available nearby for nesting4. Small freshwater lakes and shallow marshes with abundant emergent vegetation1, 4 are preferred to open water4, as are small waterbodies forming part of a larger wetland, lake or river system, especially in the valleys of small forested rivers7. Other suitable habitats include small ponds, pools3, 7, oxbow lakes, lagoons7 and slow-flowing streams6, 7. Non-breeding Outside of the breeding season the species frequents similar habitats to those in which it breeds6, including marsh and lake habitats and other sheltered waters with high productivity and abundant vegetation2 as well as flooded fields and artificial waters (e.g. reservoirs)7. During the winter the species also occurs along the coast1, 5 on saline7 or brackish lagoons with abundant submergent vegetation2, saltmarshes3, tidal creeks4, intertidal mudflats2, 4, river deltas3, estuarine waters2, 3 and even sheltered coastal bays3, although it does show a preference for marshes with mud flats for foraging rather than more saline or open-water habitats4. Diet Breeding In spring and summer the diet of the species consists predominantly of animal matter such as molluscs, worms, insects and crustaceans1. Non-breeding During winter the species mainly takes the seeds of aquatic plants1 (e.g. emergent and submerged macrophytes)2, grasses, sedges and agricultural grain1 (cereals and rice)2. Breeding site The nest is a hollow in the ground placed amongst dense vegetation1 or under bushes close to water (rarely more then 100 m away)2. Neighbouring pairs may sometimes nest only 1 m apart although the species is not colonial7. Management information A study in the Czech Republic found that fish ponds with a fish stock density of less than 400 kg ha1, water transparency of more than 50 cm, mixed fish stocks (e.g. tench and pike or perch) rather than monospecific stocks (e.g. of carp), and systems that include ponds with fish fry (to provide areas with low fish competition and high invertebrate availability) are more successful in supporting breeding pairs of this species11. Studies in Danish coastal wetlands found that the spatial restriction of shore-based shooting was more successful at maintaining waterfowl population sizes than was the temporal restriction of shooting, and therefore that wildfowl reserves should incorporate shooting-free refuges that include adjacent marshland in order to ensure high waterfowl species diversity20.
Threats This species is threatened by lowland habitat loss and degradation (e.g. through wetland drainage)11 and by upland habitat loss due to afforestation and other land-use changes2. The species suffers mortality as a result of lead shot ingestion (France)23 and from poisoning by white phosphorous ingestion (from firearms) in Alaska21. It is also intensively hunted in its winter quarters1. The species is threatened by disturbance from human recreational activities19, hunting20 and construction work (UK)18. The species is susceptible to avian botulism9 and avian influenza10, 17 so may be threatened by future outbreaks of these diseases. Utilisation The species is hunted for sport in North America8, 12, Denmark13, France14 and Italy15, and is hunted commercially and recreationally in Iran16. The eggs of this species were (and possibly still are) harvested in Iceland22.
References 1. del Hoyo et al. (1992). 2. Kear (2005b). 3. Madge and Burn (1988). 4. Johnsgard (1978). 5. Scott and Rose (1996). 6. Brown et al. (1982). 7. Snow and Perrins (1998). 8. Baldassarre and Bolen (1994). 9. Rocke (2006). 10. Melville and Shortridge (2006). 11. Musil (2006). 12. Padding et al. (2006). 13. Bregnballe et al. (2006). 14. Mondain-Monval et al. (2006). 15. Sorrenti et al. (2006). 16. Balmaki and Barati (2006). 17. Gaidet et al. (2007). 18. Burton et al. (2002). 19. Pease et al. (2005). 20. Bregnballe et al. (2004). 21. Steele et al. (1997). 22. Gudmundsson (1979). 23. Mondain-Monval et al. (2002). 24. Wetlands International (2002).
Further web sources of information
Detailed species account from Birds in Europe: population estimates, trends and conservation status (BirdLife International 2004)
Text account compilers Stuart Butchart (BirdLife International), Sally Fisher (BirdLife International), Lucy Malpas (BirdLife International)
IUCN Red List evaluators Jeremy Bird (BirdLife International), Stuart Butchart (BirdLife International)
Recommended citation BirdLife International (2009) Species factsheet: Anas crecca. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 10/2/2010
This information is based upon, and updates, the information published in BirdLife International (2000) Threatened birds of the world. Barcelona and Cambridge, UK: Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004 CD-ROM and BirdLife International (2008) Threatened birds of the world 2008 CD-ROM. These sources provide the information for species accounts for the birds on the IUCN Red List.
To provide new information to update this factsheet or to correct any errors, please email BirdLife
To contribute to discussions on the evaluation of the IUCN Red List status of Globally Threatened Birds, please visit BirdLife's Globally Threatened Bird Forums
Advertising more »
Contact Us | Feedback | Jobs | Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions
© 2010 BirdLife International. Working together for birds and people.