Search | Tips
Home
About BirdLife
Our Vision
Global Overview
BirdLife Finances
BirdLife Partnership
Regional Work
Africa
Americas
Caribbean
Asia
Europe
Middle East
Pacific
Antarctica
News
Features
Press Releases
Video
Subscribe
News Archive Search
Global Programmes
Climate Change
Seabirds
Flyways
Preventing Extinctions
Forests of Hope
Action
Action Index
Campaigns
Conservation Science
Action on the Ground
Advocating Change
BirdLife & Business
Developing Capacity
Building Awareness
Publications
World Birdwatch
Books
BCI
Help BirdLife
Donate
Fundraise
Give a Legacy
Join BirdLife
Support a Campaign
Surf the Web
Data Zone
Search Species
Search Sites
Search EBAs
State of Birds
Threatened bird ofthe day: Feb 9, 2010 Imperial Amazon Amazona imperialis
In this Section
Search for Species
Species Information
Terms & Definitions
Taxonomy
References A-L
References M-Z
See Also
Mystery of wintering Spoon-billed Sandpipers ...
Kiribati stamps celebrate shorebirds
What's New (2009)
Species facts & figures
Global Species Programme
The BirdLife checklist of the birds of the world with conservation status and taxonomic sources. Version 2 [.zip, 1.5mb]
Related Sites
International Year of Biodiversity
IUCN species of the day
Lynx Edicions
Threatened Birds of the World - Buy online
Printer friendly view
Subscribe to News
Bookmark & Share
Change Language
Home > Data Zone >
Justification This species is confined to only four predator-free islands, and has a very small overall range. As such, the accidental introduction of alien species could easily cause local extinction, and it is therefore classified as Vulnerable.
Family/Sub-family Scolopacidae
Species name author (Buller, 1869)
Taxonomic source(s) Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993), Turbott (1990)
Identification 20 cm. Small, compact, variegated brown snipe. Top of head striped black, brown/reddish-brown. Rest of body mottled black, brown/reddish-brown except for pale lower breast, belly. Voice Male call, low trerk, trerk, trerk and queeyoo, queeyoo, queeyoo.
Population estimate
Population trend
Range estimate (breeding/resident)
Country endemic?
1,800 - 2,200
stable
5 km2
Yes
Range & population Coenocorypha pusilla is confined to four small, predator-free islands in the Chatham Islands, New Zealand, where it is common and considered stable. It was once widespread throughout the group. The population is estimated at c.900-1,100 pairs. Most of these, 700-800 pairs, are on Rangatira (=South East) Island. The population on Mangere Island (which was reintroduced from Rangatira Island) is between 200-250 pairs. Birds have recently colonised Little Mangere Island, and a population was recently found on Star Keys (totalling less than 50 pairs)2,4. Vagrant snipe have been seen on Pitt Island and nearby Rabbit Island11.
Ecology: It breeds from the shore to island summits, but is most common in Plagianthus chathamicus and Olearia traversi forest. It builds its nests under dense vegetation, and usually lays two eggs5,6. It is insectivorous4. Its age of first breeding and life expectancy are unknown, but other Coenocorypha snipe can breed at one year old, and live up to 17 years7,12.
Threats The historical range of the species was reduced as the result of the introduction of predators such as cats and rats Rattus spp.4,13. Birds attempting to colonise neighbouring Pitt Island are killed by cats and Weka Gallirallus australis (introduced following the species extirpation from the main Chatham islands) 8.
Conservation measures underway In 1970, the species was successfully reintroduced from Rangatira Island to Mangere Island, after feral cats were eradicated2. Captive breeding was attempted in 1983 & 1987 but failed2,3. A 2001 trial at holding snipe in captivity was successful10.
Conservation measures proposed Monitor population trends through regular surveys. Reintroduce snipe to the predator-fenced portion of Ellen Elizabeth Preece Conservation Covenant on Pitt Island1,2,8,13 Restore sufficient mammal-free forest areas within the Chatham Islands to allow the species to establish self-sustaining populations that require minimal management1,2,13.
References 1. Aikman et al. (2001). 2. Aikman and Miskelly (2004). 3. Heather and Robertson (1997). 4. Higgins and Davies (1996). 5. Miskelly (1990). 6. Miskelly (1999a). 7. Miskelly (1999b). 8. Colin Miskelly (pers. comm.). 9. Colin Miskelly and Allan Baker (unpubl.). 10. Miskelly and Barlow (2001). 11. Miskelly et al. (2006). 12. Miskelly and Sagar (2005). 13. Roberts and Miskelly (2003).
Text account compilers Phil Benstead (BirdLife International), Simon Mahood (BirdLife International), Rachel McClellan (BirdLife International), John Pilgrim (BirdLife International)
Contributors B. D. Bell (Wildlife Management International), Colin Miskelly (Department of Conservation)
IUCN Red List evaluators Stuart Butchart (BirdLife International), Simon Mahood (BirdLife International)
Recommended citation BirdLife International (2009) Species factsheet: Coenocorypha pusilla. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 9/2/2010
This information is based upon, and updates, the information published in BirdLife International (2000) Threatened birds of the world. Barcelona and Cambridge, UK: Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004 CD-ROM and BirdLife International (2008) Threatened birds of the world 2008 CD-ROM. These sources provide the information for species accounts for the birds on the IUCN Red List.
To provide new information to update this factsheet or to correct any errors, please email BirdLife
To contribute to discussions on the evaluation of the IUCN Red List status of Globally Threatened Birds, please visit BirdLife's Globally Threatened Bird Forums
Advertising more »
Contact Us | Feedback | Jobs | Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions
© 2010 BirdLife International. Working together for birds and people.