BirdLife
  show additional data
VU Black-cheeked Lovebird  Agapornis nigrigenis

2009 IUCN Red List Category (as evaluated by BirdLife International - the official Red List Authority for birds for IUCN): Vulnerable

Justification This species is listed as Vulnerable because it has a small population which is undergoing a continuing decline, principally owing to the gradual dessication of water bodies within a highly localised range.

Family/Sub-family Psittacidae

Species name author Sclater, 1906

Taxonomic source(s) Dowsett and Forbes-Watson (1993), Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993)

Identification 14 cm. Fast-flying parrot. All-green, apart from dark brown head, orange bib below throat, and white eye-ring. Bright red bill. Juvenile similar but with more orange bill. Voice Loud and piercing shrieks, identical to those of other lovebirds. Hints It forages predominantly at ground-level on annual-grass seeds, but also arboreally on other vegetable matter and insect larvae, as well as ripening sorghum and millet fields3,9,10.

Population estimate

Population trend

Range estimate (breeding/resident)

Country endemic?

2,500-9,999

decreasing

16,400 km2

No


Range & population Agapornis nigrigenis occurs patchily in south-west Zambia between the Kafue river to the north and the Zambezi river to the south8, with an Extent of Occurrence of c.14,400 km2, within which the core breeding areas cover c.2,500 km2 2,4. The species is found in an area of 4,550 km2 of mopane woodland, 3,200 km2 of which occurs in the Zambezi catchment11. It used to occur more widely2,4, although some isolated historical records may reflect feral populations4, as may unconfirmed records from the eastern Caprivi region of Namibia2,4. However, these might refer to birds from wild populations11. There have also been unconfirmed records from Botswana and Zimbabwe. The core population can be split into two subpopulations during the dry season, those in the Zambezi catchment (c.6,200 birds in 1994) and the Kafue catchment (c.3,800 birds in 1994)11. In 1994, the overall population density in presumed breeding habitat was c.2.2 birds/km2 (this does not reflect their clumped distribution10) and the total population was estimated to be 10,000 individuals4,11. Evidence from farmers and bird-trappers suggests that this is a considerably lower total than in the early 20th century4,7.

Important Bird Areas Click here to view map showing IBAs where species is recorded and triggers any of the IBA criteria.

Ecology: It inhabits deciduous woodland, dominated by mopane Colophospermum (not Baikiaea1,4, as formerly reported7), where permanent supplies of surface water exist4,11. It commutes to adjoining habitats, such as riverine vegetation and agricultural areas, to forage and drink16. It requires daily access to water4,8,9,11, and needs to drink twice each day12,16. In the dry season it congregates in large flocks of up to 800 or more in some areas8. It relies on water sources that are not regularly disturbed by humans and livestock16,17. It breeds in holes in mature mopane trees near roosting sites2,13, during January-May10,12. Fidelity to nest-sites is suspected12. The breeding season coincides with the annual maximum rainfall and the beginning of the dry season15, and pairs usually raise a single clutch12,15. Broods of six and seven nestlings have been observed15. The species roosts in naturally formed cavities in live mopane trees12,13. Food largely consists of annual grass seeds, other seeds of annual herbs and ripening crop seeds (millet and sorghum)11,12,14. They have also been observed to consume invertebrates, leaves, flowers, nectar, bark, lichen, resin and soil12,14. The crop-ripening season coincides with the species's breeding season12,16 and its appetite for crop seeds has earned it a reputation locally as a pest11,12. In south-west Zambia, it has been recorded that 18% of millet seed heads suffered more than 20% damage from the species during the ripening season12.

Threats Three factors are thought to have caused its decline the past century: heavy exploitation for the cage-bird trade from the 1920s7 to the 1960s11, gradual dessication of its habitat7,11,12, which is thought to be (currently) the main threat given the highly localised range of the species12, and the partial replacement of sorghum and millet crops, an attractive food source2,4,10, with maize, between c.1930 and 19504,11. There is evidence that the wild-caught trade in this species is currently at a very low level, with only isolated incidences of trade and export11,15, although it is clear that any international demand would be met eagerly13,16. Some birds are caught for subsistence consumption11,15, and it is also persecuted as a pest, however these birds would usually be eaten as well11. Farmers take measures to mitigate damage to crops11,12, but they are largely ineffective and rarely lethal12. The current levels of hunting and capture are unlikely to have any serious long-term impact on the population, but could threaten local populations suffering from the effects of dessiccation11. Recently there may have been local declines due to loss of surface water supplies in the dry season, perhaps due to long-term climate change2,4,8,11. The number of permanent water sources in mopane woodland has decreased since the early 20th Century11. The low availability of water in the dry season is probably the principal factor in the disappearance of permanent populations from the Bovu and Sinde Rivers, and changes to the Ngweze River population11. This is exacerbated by a decrease in the annual rainfall in the species's habitat of, on average, about 5 mm per year between 1950 and 1995, increasing the species's reliance on artificial water sources16. The recent establishment of hand-pumped boreholes along the catchments of the Ngweze, Sichifulo, and Machile rivers may lead to a decrease in the availability of surface water as people reduce their water source creation activities in riverbeds16. In some areas, water pools are poisoned to kill fish and this can impact the species11. The species may be threatened by the declining dry-season availability of water in temporary rivers in south-western Zambia, due to declining levels of rainfall17. Mopane woodland is exploited for firewood and timber, though the habitat is regenerating and encroaching into other habitats in some areas11. Psittacine Beak and Feather Disease Virus is present in the wild population12,15, but there is no evidence that this is a serious threat.

Conservation measures underway CITES Appendix II. Trapping of birds for trade is now banned5. In Zambia, a trade ban on wild-caught birds was implemented in 193016. Approximately 35% of its habitat lies within Kafue National Park and surrounding Game Management Areas5,6, whilst most of its core range is included within the Machile and Kafue National Park IBAs18. Detailed research programmes on this species were underway in the 1990s2,4,5,8,9 from which reports have been published. An education project focusing on the species was conducted in south-west Zambia in September 2001, involving local schools, villagers and Zambia Wildlife Authority scouts12.

Conservation measures proposed Conduct regular (e.g. monthly)11 counts at selected sites (such as water sources in the dry season)12,16 to monitor its population4,5, concentrating on the core distribution11. Conduct annual monitoring in areas such as the mid-Machile and Sichifulo rivers and the Mabiya pools region of south Kafue National Park16. Monitor the availability of surface water in the dry season16. Investigate its status in the eastern Caprivi4,11. Encourage its return to former range areas, initially through piloting the provision of undisturbed water sources and strips of sorghum and millet8. Continue a programme of environmental education involving school-visits4,11,12 and meetings with farming communities12 to reduce trapping and disturbance at water sources16. Provide training in ornithology and conservation for potential local surveyors11. Hold meetings with villagers on the protection of resources such as trees and water11. Maintain and create water resources with minimal disturbance12. Continue to enforce the trade ban on wild-caught birds of this species12,13,16. Investigate the effect of burning on the availability of grass seeds14. Manage water sources (e.g. add perching structures) to encourage use by the species16. Assess the impact of pumped boreholes on surface water supplies16.

References 1. Benson and Irwin (1967). 2. Dodman (1995b). 3. Dodman (1995a). 4. Dodman (1997). 5. T. Dodman in litt. (2000). 6. P. Leonard in litt. (1999). 7. Moreau (1948). 8. Warburton (1999b). 9. Warburton (1999a). 10. L. S. Warburton in litt. (1999, 2000). 11. Dodman (1995c). 12. Warburton (2003). 13. Warburton and Perrin (2005a). 14. Warburton and Perrin (2005b). 15. Warburton and Perrin (2005c). 16. Warburton and Perrin (2005d). 17. T. Dodman in litt. (2007). 18. Leonard (2005).

Text account compilers Jonathan Ekstrom (BirdLife International), Mike Evans (BirdLife International), John Pilgrim (BirdLife International), Sue Shutes (BirdLife International), Malcolm Starkey (BirdLife International), Joe Taylor (BirdLife International)

Contributors Dylan Aspinwall, Tim Dodman (Wetlands International Africa, Europe, Middle East), M.P.S Irwin, Pete Leonard, Dave Rockingham-Gill (BirdLife Zimbabwe), L. S. Warburton (University of KwaZulu-Natal)

IUCN Red List evaluators Stuart Butchart (BirdLife International), Joe Taylor (BirdLife International)

Recommended citation BirdLife International (2009) Species factsheet: Agapornis nigrigenis. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 9/2/2010

This information is based upon, and updates, the information published in BirdLife International (2000) Threatened birds of the world. Barcelona and Cambridge, UK: Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004 CD-ROM and BirdLife International (2008) Threatened birds of the world 2008 CD-ROM. These sources provide the information for species accounts for the birds on the IUCN Red List.

To provide new information to update this factsheet or to correct any errors, please email BirdLife

To contribute to discussions on the evaluation of the IUCN Red List status of Globally Threatened Birds, please visit BirdLife's Globally Threatened Bird Forums


Advertising more »

BirdLife GAM Code V1