![]() | For many species, effective conservation depends on targeting resources at the site scale. This is true for birds and thus sites of particular significance have been identified by BirdLife International as Important Bird Areas (IBAs). Protecting the 10,000 IBAs identified to date would make an enormous contribution towards ensuring the survival of bird species and much other biodiversity besides. It would also help secure the vital ecosystem services that these sites frequently provide to local people. |
Using a set of standardised selection criteria based on threat and irreplaceability, more than 10,000 Important Bird Areas (IBAs) have been identified in nearly 200 countries (
). So far, these criteria have been applied mainly on land and for freshwater; however, work is underway to identify IBAs in the open oceans (
). Wherever possible, the process of IBA identification is led by the national BirdLife Partner. This feeds the best local knowledge into the process as well as building engagement and capacity for conservation and monitoring in the area. By mid-2010, five continental directories and 126 national IBA inventories had been published in a variety of languages (
).
Protecting a network of core habitats can be an effective way of conserving species, often capturing a large proportion of the total population at relatively few key sites. For instance, safeguarding the Blue Swallow Hirundo atrocaerulea (classified as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List) in Africa could be significantly advanced through a network of 34 IBAs which need only cover a small fraction of the species’s overall range (
). Establishing networks of IBAs is particularly important for migrants, such as the Blue Swallow, which typically utilise a series of widely separated sites throughout the course of their annual migrations (
).
Evidence shows that IBAs also support a wealth of other biodiversity (
,
,
). For instance, in East Africa, the IBA network captures 97% of the region’s endemic mammals, 90% of its globally threatened mammals, and 92% of its endemic snakes and amphibians (
). IBAs consequently provide an effective ‘first cut’ for an overall network of Key Biodiversity Areas (KBAs), the most significant sites for biodiversity conservation worldwide (
). Robust measures are needed to maintain biodiversity in the face of climate change. Safeguarding the existing network of IBAs (in conjunction with adaptation measures and the identification of additional sites) will play a key role in mitigating the worst impacts of climate change on birds and other wildlife (
).
The conservation of IBAs not only helps biodiversity—many provide a wide range of services that benefit humans locally and globally (
). In particular, healthy, biodiverse environments provide resilience against the consequences of climate change, such as drought, crop failure, flooding, sea-level rise, and extreme weather events that are already being felt around the world (
,
,
). Community engagement and involvement in IBA conservation is vital. This is increasingly being achieved through the actions of Local Conservation Groups (LCGs). Numbering over 2,500 worldwide, LCGs foster local participation in conservation and often focus on the most marginalised community members (
). The results of such local involvement can lead to significant conservation benefits (
,
).
Data on IBAs are being used to inform environmental impact assessments, through the Integrated Biodiversity Assessment Tool (IBAT)—a new decision support tool for business, government and conservation (
).
IBAs make a crucial contribution to identifying where there are gaps in the existing protected area system. In Europe, BirdLife’s IBA inventory has been adopted as a ‘shadow list’ in creating a network of Special Protection Areas (SPAs) (
). In many regions, the inventory has been used to identify potential Ramsar sites (wetlands of international importance) while, worldwide, ‘gap analyses’ comparing the locations of IBAs with those of protected areas have helped countries implement the CBD Programme of Work on Protected Areas (POWPA) (
).
The IBA Protection Index measures the degree to which IBAs are covered by protected areas and provides a useful metric to judge progress in reducing biodiversity loss (
). The IBA indices show that sites with formal protection are in better and more stable condition than those without (
). Currently, a high proportion of IBAs remain unprotected, including many that hold globally threatened species (
) and only around 25% of IBAs have full legal protection.
The world’s IBAs are monitored using a standardised and simple framework. Such monitoring, carried out by local groups, volunteers, government staff and BirdLife Partners, generates data for IBA indices that provide powerful tools for quantifying conservation efforts and measuring their impact (
).
To access case studies on Important Bird Areas, please click on the following links.
Links
10,000 sites to save, Global Important Bird Areas
Compiled 2010
Recommended citation
BirdLife International (2010) Spotlight on Important Bird Areas. Presented as part of the BirdLife State of the world's birds website. Available from: http://www.birdlife.org/datazone