Search | Tips
Home
About BirdLife
Our Vision
Global Overview
BirdLife Finances
BirdLife Partnership
Regional Work
Africa
Americas
Caribbean
Asia
Europe
Middle East
Pacific
Antarctica
News
Features
Press Releases
Video
Subscribe
News Archive Search
Global Programmes
Climate Change
Seabirds
Flyways
Preventing Extinctions
Forests of Hope
Action
Action Index
Campaigns
Conservation Science
Action on the Ground
Advocating Change
BirdLife & Business
Developing Capacity
Building Awareness
Publications
World Birdwatch
Books
BCI
Help BirdLife
Donate
Fundraise
Give a Legacy
Join BirdLife
Support a Campaign
Surf the Web
Data Zone
Search Species
Search Sites
Search EBAs
State of Birds
Threatened bird ofthe day: Feb 10, 2010 Taliabu Masked-owl Tyto nigrobrunnea
In this Section
Search for Sites
Sites Programme
Why apply IBA criteria?
Global IBA Criteria
European IBA Criteria
Middle East IBA Criteria
See Also
Important Bird Areas
Printer friendly view
Subscribe to News
Bookmark & Share
Change Language
Home > Data Zone >
Justification This species has declined rapidly, largely owing to direct poisoning, power-line collisions and loss of its grassland breeding habitat owing to afforestation, mining, agriculture and development. It is therefore listed as Vulnerable. Although probably stable at present, the population could easily decline again unless appropriate conservation measures are implemented. Evidence of continued population stability or increases may qualify the species for downlisting to Near Threatened in due course.
Family/Sub-family Gruidae
Species name author (Lichtenstein, 1793)
Taxonomic source(s) Dowsett and Forbes-Watson (1993), Sibley and Monroe (1990, 1993)
Synonyms Anthropoides paradisea Dowsett and Forbes-Watson (1993)
Identification 100 -120 cm. Small, blue-grey crane. Overall greyish at distance, with long, decurved "tail" (very long tertials). Very pale blue, unusually large head, with proportionately thin neck. Similar spp. Immature Wattled Crane G. carunculatus very much larger, with white on breast and neck. Voice Loud, guttural ringing calls, often made when flying or in pairs. Typical crane-like honkings. Hints Sometimes in large flocks in open pastures in Drakensberg foothills, grassy Karoo, Western Cape wheatlands (South Africa) and on the grasslands within and north of Etosha National Park, Namibia.
Population estimate
Population trend
Range estimate (breeding/resident)
Country endemic?
26,000
decreasing
887,000 km2
No
Range & population Grus paradisea is near-endemic to South Africa, with small breeding populations also in northern Namibia (c.70 birds at Etosha, isolated but stable9 after rapidly declining in 1980s-1990s) and western Swaziland (c.12 birds)4, and it is occasionally seen in Lesotho11. In South Africa, numbers in the south and south-western Western Cape and KwaZulu-Natal have increased as the species has expanded into agricultural areas11 but, overall, the national population has fallen by half since the 1970s, with dramatic declines in many former strongholds, e.g. of up to 80% in Mpumalanga, KwaZulu-Natal, Free State and Eastern Cape during the 1980s1,2. The increase in the Western Cape has accompanied the conversion of fynbos and renosterveld vegetation to agricultural land13. The population in the central Karoo region is presently stable13. The population has been estimated at c.25,700 individuals5,7, but more recently at over 25,580 individuals12, with a minimum of 25,520 in South Africa13.
Important Bird Areas Click here to view map showing IBAs where species is recorded and triggers any of the IBA criteria.
Ecology: Behaviour This species is a partial migrant which makes local, seasonal movements across elevational gradients (best documented in Natal)1,16. There is also some movement into the Karoo biome during the winter months16. However in some areas it appears to be resident or locally nomadic15. It breeds, usually at high elevations, between August and April, with a distinct peak in November in South Africa, December to March in Namibia, and November in Botswana15. It is a territorial, solitary breeder15, and while nesting has been found to occur at a density of 0.57 pairs per square kilometre of appropriate habitat1. After breeding there is movement to lower altitudes, where the species becomes highly congregatory, occurring regularly in flocks of around 5017, and occasionally numbering up to 100015. It roosts at night, often communally, with roosts being known to comprise hundreds and sometimes thousands of birds15. Habitat Breeding This species breeds in natural grass- and sedge-dominated habitats, preferring secluded grasslands at high elevations where the vegetation is thick and short1. Occasionally it will breed in or near wetland areas1, in pans or on islands in dams15. Particularly in W Cape of South Africa it also uses lowland agricultural areas, particularly pasture, fallow fields and cereal crop fields as stubble becomes available after harvest1,15. A few pairs in this area also breed in the coastal dunes15. Non-breeding During the non-breeding season the species occurs at lower altitudes18. It inhabits short, dry, natural grasslands, as well as the Karoo and fynbos biomes1. In the Karoo it is mainly restricted to areas where summer rainfall exceeds 300mm15 and where grassland vegetation rather than scrub is dominant1. In the fynbos it occurs almost exclusively in cultivated habitats, largely avoiding the natural vegetation1, although this habitat may provide important cover for juveniles8. The agricultural habitats that it uses include pastures, croplands, particularly where cereal crops are grown1, and fallow fields. It is intolerant of intensively grazed and burnt grassland15. It roosts in shallow wetlands1,15. Diet This species feeds primarily on plant material including the seeds of sedges and grasses, roots, tubers and small bulbs14,15. It also takes a variety of animals including insects such as locusts and their eggs, grasshoppers, termites and caterpillars, worms, crabs, fish, frogs, reptiles and small mammals14,15. In agricultural areas it feeds on cereal grains such as wheat and maize, and also eats invertebrate crop pests14,15. Breeding site In wetland breeding sites the nest is a simple pad of wetland vegetation15,18. Elsewhere it may consist of a layer of small stones, dry vegetation or mammal dung15,18, or eggs may be laid directly on the grass or on bare ground1. Preferred nesting sites usually have good all-round visibility15.
Threats The main factors behind its drastic population decline since the 1970s were widespread poisoning on agricultural land (both intentional and accidental2) and the commercial afforestation of large tracts of its grassland nesting habitat1,2. Poisoning has decreased dramatically over the last few years. Accidental poisoning, however, still occurs occasionally when grain is soaked in agrochemicals for the capture of wildlife for food, although cranes are not usually the target species, and also as a result of the misuse of agrochemicals11. Cranes are social birds and poisoning incidences often involve a number of individuals11. Afforestation is ongoing and large tracts of suitable grassland habitat have been designated for afforestation over the few years following 2007 in the Eastern Cape, KwaZulu-Natal, and the Western Cape11. Other major threats include collision with power-lines, which is now arguably the major cause of mortality and could have been a major hidden cause before lines were monitored11, entanglement with fences, illegal capture of fledglings (for pets or food), predation by domestic dogs and the drowning of chicks in water-troughs1,2. In the Western Cape, the species is threatened by a change in agricultural crops and increases in the human population in agricultural areas8,11. Climate change could force changes in agricultural practices that may be detrimental to the species11. Prolonged dry spells and the resultant competition with domestic stock for habitat at such times are considered a major threat in Namibia6,11.
Conservation measures underway CITES Appendix II. CMS Appendix II. Conservation measures have expanded in scale since the mid-1980s, including efforts to mitigate power-line collisions, the adoption of stricter legal protection, local and national surveys in South Africa, increasing research on the species's biology and ecology, habitat protection and management programmes (especially on private land), establishment of local conservation organisations, and the development of educational facilities, programmes and publications1,2. The introduction of more ecologically sensitive agrochemicals and tighter controls over their use has reduced the number of poisoning events11. The formation of a Crane Working Group in Namibia has facilitated education, surveys, ringing and protection10. Future studies in Namibia will assess whether its population is genetically isolated from that in South Africa, and will use transmitters to help study habitat use, their choice of breeding areas and the occurrence of inter-breeding9.
Conservation measures proposed Prevent conversion of grassland habitat to other land uses11. Monitor the species's population trends through regular surveys. Include habitat management in future planning of afforestable regions2. Encourage more responsible use of agrochemicals2. Target awareness campaigns at the farming community so as to increase awareness and reduce deliberate poisoning of cranes for food2,11. Make hazardous power-lines more visible with appropriate devices2. Discourage the taking of fledglings from the wild2. Encourage the retention of a mosaic of pasture and cereal cultivation in the Western Cape8. Increase conservation protection of grasslands and wetlands north of Etosha National Park11.
References 1. Archibald and Meine (1996). 2. Barnes (2000). 3. Harrison et al. (1997). 4. Parker (1994). 5. Simmons et al. (1996). 6. R. Simmons in litt. (1999). 7. McCann et al. (2005). 8. Bidwell et al. (2006). 9. Simmons et al. (2006). 10. R. Simmons in litt. (2007). 11. K. Morrison et al. in litt. (2007). 12. Beilfuss et al. (2007). 13. McCann et al. (2007). 14. del Hoyo et al. (1996). 15. Hockey et al. (2005). 16. Vernon et al. (1992). 17. Filmer and Holtshausen (1992). 17. Walkinshaw (1973)
Further web sources of information
International Crane Foundation Species Field Guide
Status, Survey and Conservation Action Plan
Text account compilers Jonathan Ekstrom (BirdLife International), Mike Evans (BirdLife International), John Pilgrim (BirdLife International), Sue Shutes (BirdLife International), Joe Taylor (BirdLife International)
Contributors Mark Anderson (North Cape Dep. of Tourism, Env. and Conservation), Bradley Gibbons (Endangered Wildlife Trust), Kerryn Morrison (ICF/EWT Partnership), Ann Scott (Namibia Crane Working Group), Mike Scott (Namibia Crane Working Group), Kevin Shaw (Western Cape Nature Conservation Board), Leon Theron (Endangered Wildlife Trust)
IUCN Red List evaluators Stuart Butchart (BirdLife International), Joe Taylor (BirdLife International)
Recommended citation BirdLife International (2009) Species factsheet: Grus paradisea. Downloaded from http://www.birdlife.org on 10/2/2010
This information is based upon, and updates, the information published in BirdLife International (2000) Threatened birds of the world. Barcelona and Cambridge, UK: Lynx Edicions and BirdLife International, BirdLife International (2004) Threatened birds of the world 2004 CD-ROM and BirdLife International (2008) Threatened birds of the world 2008 CD-ROM. These sources provide the information for species accounts for the birds on the IUCN Red List.
To provide new information to update this factsheet or to correct any errors, please email BirdLife
To contribute to discussions on the evaluation of the IUCN Red List status of Globally Threatened Birds, please visit BirdLife's Globally Threatened Bird Forums
Advertising more »
Contact Us | Feedback | Jobs | Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms and Conditions
© 2010 BirdLife International. Working together for birds and people.