alaotra鸊鷉滅絕-你關心嗎?

2010年5月26日,星期三,

非洲熱門故事

alaotra鸊鷉滅絕 - 你關心嗎?

今天,我們宣布,來自馬達加斯加的水鳥,Alaotra鸊鷉是正式紅色名單(滅絕)。

渡渡鳥滅絕的物種在其描繪的書籍,漫畫和良好的表達式死作為一個突突的是毫無疑問的'名人'。

少約渡渡鳥是一組單獨的島嶼,不會飛的鳥,滅絕人的手,或通過引進的食肉動物與人的到來,他們的島嶼,它負責。 公元1500年以來,超過130種鳥類已經滅絕,主要是因為人類活動...

在滅絕的鳥類名單仔細看看,發現了一套熟悉的鳥類,如海燕,蒼鷺,鴨,moorhens,鴿子,鴿子,鸚鵡,畫眉,鶯和八哥已經丟失。 alaotra鸊鷉也加入兩個鸊鷉滅絕已成為20世紀的最後一個季度,如最近其他物種-哥倫比亞鸊鷉和亞哥阿提蘭鸊鷉。

下週,標誌著另一個週年 - 著名 - 鳥類滅絕。 於1844年6月3,一雙大的海雀最後被屠宰​​,女性仍然孵化蛋在Eldey冰島海岸的岩石。 最有趣的這個星球上消失的鳥類,其第一個名字是原來的企鵝之一,具有諷刺意味的愛我們這個星球上最好的一個鳥類群體。

如果企鵝物種滅絕,它很可能會進入旁邊的渡渡鳥的名人地位。 鸊鷉alaotra會已為大多數人所知,但像一個偉大的畫家,其作品被確認後,他們已經死亡,但現在會變得更好,因為它的滅絕。

鸊鷉的Alaotra滅絕,許多物種的發現自己現在是一個危險狀態的提醒。 今天的紅名單更新,包括190種被列為極危。 這包括胡寧鸊鷉的LES有一個人口超過250人,最近的調查表明,人口的進一步下降。

鳥類夥伴關係的承諾,停止任何滅絕( 點擊這裡了解更多 )。

今天是一個在今年的黑天國際生物多樣性年

當我們宣傳的威脅或滅絕的新聞媒體所帶來的第一個問題是:“我們為什麼要關心?”

為什麼人們應該關心去滅絕一個物種時使用下面的評論列表,請添加您的想法。

國際生物多樣性年

圖片信貸: 克里斯·羅斯

相關文章:

  1. 已經滅絕的鳥類物種名單 見滅絕的鳥類的完整列表....

寫這篇文章:

-誰寫了鳥類共同體 40個職位。

阿德長是國際鳥盟的通信主管。

122“Alaotra鸊鷉滅絕 - 你關心嗎?”

  1. edsta說:

    這是一個美麗的鳥兒。 我一直想在馬達加斯加旅遊。 似乎貧窮的國家,有一些最奇特的動植物。 我真的不想要責怪的人,因為他們只是想生存下去,但我認為政府可以把更多的精力alittle位。 如此悲傷。

    回复

  2. 喬爾說:

    滅絕一直是悲劇性的,因為它是如此的最後。

    回复

  3. 蒂姆·厄珀姆說:

    當鳥被認為瀕臨滅絕的許多倍,這是情況並非總是如此。 象牙喙啄木鳥在阿肯色州被重新發現。 目擊已在緬甸的粉紅色雙頭鴨。 在菲律賓宿務島,宿霧flowerpecker被重新發現。 因此,讓我們不收書上Alaorta鸊鷉。

    回复

  4. 胡里奧·雷斯說:

    我為什麼關心? 兩個原因,到現在我的腦海裡:所有權和責任。

    1。 *所有權。*作為一個基督徒,我相信整個宇宙屬於神。 作為一個有情的物種具有認識造物主,他發現自己對我的力量,影響他的創作在我身邊,我只是一個宇宙的管家。 我不擁有它,我認為在信任;不為子孫後代,但上帝,誰創造了一切,並宣布他的喜悅在他的作品的時間和時間,再次在基督教聖經。 世界不是我的使用,因為我看到合適的,但只有體面的,可持續的限度內。 任何其他手段“已在神的形像創造的”,肯定它強烈地暗示,上帝並沒有創造世界,發音為“非常好”,然後把它給人類,所以我們可以垃圾。 (事實上,你可以google一塊關於這個問題的一個神的頭腦“地球驅逐艦”)。因此,每一個滅絕是在上帝的臉一巴掌,因為它是。

    2。 *責任。我不能漠不關心,一個物種的喪失,以為有別人,就像我不能做同樣的關於人類。 所有的人會死,是嗎? ,但我們戰鬥死亡:我們預防疾病,爭取它,當它發生,防止事故的發生,並盡量不要讓他們再次發生,我們嘗試在我們所知的每延長生命,我們為新的和更好的方法研究這樣做的。 我們哀悼我們從來不知道,在遠離戰爭和災難的人類死亡。 最後,當一切失去了生活的希望,我們給予姑息治療,因為有尊嚴的死亡來作為最後與盡可能少的疼痛。 事實上,人們都會死並不意味著我將殺死他們,恰恰相反。 我的孩子會死,但請,而不是在我的手。 我的鄰居會死,但我不會殺她。 在很遠的地方的人會死,但請你,我什麼都沒有做他們的死亡,我會做什麼我可以停止這些死亡。 我自己會死,但我們沒有理由採取我自己的生活。 對於我來說,它是與非人類的生命一樣。 這是我的責任和特權保護所有生命形式,並請讓它永遠不能說,我卻反其道而行之。 (我,可悲的。但是,這並不是故事的結尾。)

    回复

  5. 唐娜Lentine說:

    我們應該關心,因為我們正在摧毀我們的星球,每一個物種在保護和保存它棲息的環境起到了作用......沒有他們,我們失去的東西無法替代的......有一個自然平衡,我們正在失去平衡......有一天,它會來,我們將不能夠居住的地球,因為這將無法維持我們......那麼我們也將成為滅絕!

    回复

  6. 阿爾瓦羅CELIS說:

    我做護理......我們所做的這個星球,它的生物,它只是如此悲傷。 我希望我們可以改變,所以,沒有其他物種同樣的方式去為alaotra鸊鷉。

    回复

  7. 貝蒂說:

    然後有沒有

    回复

  8. X.Truth說:

    我們都是。 化妝的emtire宇宙中存在的水,其中我們是largeley複合。 太陽,地球上所有生命照亮和活躍,意味著我們所有的同光體。 地球wnich給其所有物種的誕生,是向所有的母親。 分裂的人類中心主義的觀點是不言而喻的 - 破壞性! 我們應該關心,因為我們是殺死自己,我們需要了解為什麼我們是這種心態影響一切,我們形成一個小的(重要)部分國家hopless。

    回复

  9. 佩內洛普說:

    你的詩是美麗的和悲慘的,南希。 我不能讀它哭。 我所能做的是我最好的肯定不會影響我的生活產生不利的任何物種。 世界國家和人民誰不關心生物多樣性打破我的心。 這是為什麼,是共和黨等同於與反環境的這些天,它從來沒有使用過。

    回复

  10. 約翰·漢弗萊斯說:

    美國博物學家查爾斯·威廉·畢比把它最喚起的:

    “美女和天才的藝術作品,可能是重新構思,雖然它的第一物質表達予以銷毀;消失了的和諧,還可能再次激發了作曲家,但沒有更多的眾生比賽的最後個人呼吸,另一個天堂另一個地球之前必須經過這樣一個可以再次。“

    回复

  11. 蘇珊說:

    在許多情況下,一個物種或另一滅絕是因為彼此的存在......有人搬進附近,需要有人搬出? 這是一件好事嗎? 失去它始終是悲傷,有時獲得。 它是人類的生存,帶來新的植物和鳥類,這是我們熟悉的,但其他的事情,這是對他人的損害? 正在做的目的,意圖破壞有什麼呢? 這實在是很難知道,如何做,而不是擾亂大自然的平衡。 我依然感激,知道一點,我就自然是在公立學校任教,這是一件好事,教所有性質和循環再造和青年,他們可以做什麼來保護地球的。

    回复

  12. owler說:

    這是我們人類失去我們知道名稱或由臉,也許一個遠房親戚或朋友的朋友的人並不少見。 但我們從來沒有機會真正了解這個人,他們覺得,他們愛和擔心。 同樣可以適用於這種鳥。 當然,我們知道的地方住了,它看上去像它的名字。 但我們並沒有真正了解物種的程度,我們常見的,'日常'鳥。 很不幸,我們沒有牧師發言這種鳥的重要性,所以我們可以記住它以積極的方式。

    回复

  13. 西蒙Mahood說:

    正如他最近花了6個月的調查現在可能滅絕(只有DNA結果會告訴Cat Tien國家公園(越南)挖走,而我們正在做調查,如果annamiticus爪哇犀牛,因為我們懷疑,一個類群的人同類的最後一個),瀕臨滅絕的概念是非常真實的。 我一直激怒了滅絕的危險,但傳達感覺如何實際見證,它是非常困難的(至少沒有不能使用本網站上使用的話)。 我懷疑這個職位的答复的數量相對較少,反映全身不適,滅絕浮現在一般公眾,我們需要做點什麼 - 保育! 那麼,為什麼我不在乎? 這是很難說的。 大多數物種有相當小的感知生態系統的功能,所以我不喜歡用這樣的藉口。 最終,我只是覺得它破壞,沒有人會再次能夠看出來湖Alaotra,看到一個小的飛鸊鷉,或走在墨西哥的松木,橡木檯面森林和看到有史以來最大的啄木鳥等,我可以繼續下去,但其令人沮喪的東西。 試想想,更在英國的樂趣觀鳥會如何,如果我們偶爾會抽搐了巨大的飛雀,從北極高緯度地區誤入 - 我們已搶過去人類的貪婪的經驗。

    回复

  14. anonomas11說:

    我們成為什麼? 為什麼我們讓這種情況發生?
    它的衝擊。 和悲哀的事情時,你想想看。
    同時,我們茁壯成長,其他下跌。 這必須停止。 我在乎。
    其它的一個非常傷心的thing.think。 像殺害某人

    回复

  15. 理查德·J說:

    當然它很重要。 這是很有可能的,幾乎每一個新的滅絕是人類。 這個星球並不需要我們時,我們都走了,它可能會呼吸的救濟巨大的嘆息。 直到那時,我們所有的(但實際上只有那些真正關心我們)應該竭盡所能地看到,我們做力所能及(ha!)可能損傷小。

    回复

  16. 喬納森·華萊士說:

    當然,有時物種滅絕,去與人類活動無關的原因,已完成第一,因為生命演變。 麻煩的是,我們越來越自然資源的貪婪需求推滅絕的速度遠遠超出了“自​​然”率。 人們可能或可能不關心的Alaotra鸊鷉滅絕(我),但大家都搶著向世界扎進一個非常貧困的動植物。 撇開所有道德,審美和philosophcal的理由,為什麼這一點很重要,我們可以達到我們自己的生存和發展的能力是由生態系統的運作上,我們也最終取決於損害的威脅點。

    回复

  17. 卡斯·休斯說:

    我不在乎,因為它是永遠失去了,這是我們的錯。 更何況,因為我愛馬達加斯加和grebes涼爽。

    回复

  18. 揚帕說:

    它所以令人擔憂的是什麼性質提供,主要是好東西,然後打哈欠幫助時,很自然,我們的戰鬥耗盡,英鎊對我們的生活在地球震動和其他harzards的形式,在一個正常的活生生的人不能apprieciate 。
    我做護理,因為每次一個物種滅絕,在食物網的連接被打破,這是在生態系統中的災難。 性質並沒有工作在gueswork,它是1生命,whtever簡化系統,我們不打,我們隨著時間的推移,最糟糕的所有其通常的未來一代,患有,所以讓我們保持我們周圍的安全,使我們脫穎而出金穗不不苦。
    一句話,“滅絕”,是一個非常受驚之後的字在我的世界的存在,每個環境教育家,和導遊/旅遊領導人的主要目的是告訴不良詞語,在我們的生態系統。

    回复

  19. 德拉甘·西米奇說:

    如果沒有人是與每一個滅絕的島嶼,我們仍然有少...,我應該說,我,我們的事業 - 我們 - 我們正在成為較小的生物,當然不太人道的人類......

    回复

  20. 小鳥亨利說:

    我照顧,但對我來說很難的事情是,我沒有真的那麼遠。 我捐了一點錢,以保護和環境教育的工作,但大約是盡可能。 我看到一些其他意見承擔著相同的情緒。 實在是很難得到過去的消極和權利被剝奪,而這正是我們都必須做到有所作為。

    至於在問題開始Aloatra鸊鷉滅絕,我為什麼要在乎 - 為什麼SHOULDN'TI護理是我出生的時候(我認為),但它不會在那裡當我死了。 鳥類的網站是非常好的,因為它包含了我們每個人都可以做的小東西。 我只希望有更多的事情要做超越回收和觀看食物里程的簡單建議。

    回复

  21. 史蒂夫羅蘭說:

    另一股從生活的網站,另一個支持我們的環境和進化的另一個獨特的作品,已經一去不復返了,和它的繼承縮減弱化,切斷我和我這一代傳遞到我們的孩子休息。

    但如果是沒有足夠的照顧的原因,那麼如何最後服務Alaotra鸊鷉,因為它為我們進行褪色在這個星球上,許多揮舞著我們周圍的環境警告標誌之一。 它警告我們不僅在馬達加斯加的湖泊生態系統賴以鸊鷉依賴和當地居民仍做的退化,但作為一個更廣泛的馬達加斯加和全球環境的緩慢分崩離析的警告標誌時,我們都依賴。

    但當然,如果有人問這個問題:“為什麼我們應該關心當一個物種的滅絕會在人的手嗎?”你有意譯關於爵士樂答复的名言“如果你不明白現在......也許你永遠也不會“。

    嚴峻。

    回复

  22. 傑伊·林登說:

    我們都應該關心,如果僅僅因為鳥是我們這個星球的健康指標。 我們需要那些尚未twigged,地球是一個大的生態系統,從這個系統,但對自然世界的組成部分,我們不單獨以教育和啟迪。

    有許多人是如此切合自然的世界,一個單一的鳥類的滅亡,一個單一的棲息地的喪失感到作為一個悲傷的。 但是,我們必須承認,並不是所有的人都這樣。 為了說服那些有不同的價值觀和關切,以改變他們的方式和珍惜自然的世界,我們需要使我們的健康和福祉的鏈接,顯示的是從根本上取決於一個健康的自然世界。

    我們每個人都可以通過傳播信息和如何一個物種的減少或損失,或將影響人類社會的例子。 我們要幫助大家了解令人不安的生態系統的實際後果 - 後果,這將影響我們所有的糧食供應或增加疾病。

    換言之關懷是不夠的。 我們需要教育自己有關生態系統的破壞,其後果,以教育他人。 我們需要聰明和戰略,聰明和狡猾。 損失Alaotra鸊鷉需要我們權力,而不是陷入絕望,但付諸行動。

    回复

  23. 皮特說:

    它是如此悲傷和遠你覺得無助,無法做任何事宜。 但我們可以,我們做什麼,我們怎樣度過,甚至如何,我們投票可能。 每一個鳥的數量。 有這麼多,我們可以做的,沒有在此生活,但不是生活本身。

    回复

  24. 歐仁妮說:

    故障是不是當地的馬達加斯加國際鳥盟的漁民也。 這是我們所有的,不自然的生活,過度procreating和接受個人,企業和政府的貪婪和腐敗。 我們都需要改變我們的生活方式,教育我們的一個或兩個孩子,照顧了我們的政治家​​或投票,反腐敗鬥爭和支持綠色技術和資源的可持續利用的地方我們可以。

    讓感到沮喪的無法動搖我們的頭腦,聽任一種無能為力的感覺 - 讓我們所有的行為積極和關閉風潮的人關心人類變化的海嘯。

    回复

  25. tahiry說:

    我關心。
    我是馬達加斯加人。 問題是當地人口poorness。 馬達加斯加有驚人的生物多樣性,動植物,但保護和養護是如此困難,如果我們不一起舉行。 我的意思是,首先要尋找解決貧困問題,同時,教育和學習主要是他們的人離開周圍的保護區,並顯示他們對生物多樣性的重要性,讓他們有多大,他們幫助這個世界上的所有人類。
    tahiry

    回复

  26. 里克說:

    我不在乎,不在乎很大。
    個人的尊重,理解,欣賞,真正熱愛鳥類和所有的性質是一個非常嚴重的(生命或死亡),2路比賽。 在本場比賽是開明的生態教育,對人類造成的棲息地的破壞賽車。 來自1)人類人口過多,並不斷擴大整個地球各類自然資源的人均消費每)棲息地的破壞。 每個種類的植物或動物是寶貴的,和他們維持生命的棲息地更為珍貴。 每個人需要問自己:我提供足夠的質量和生態排出量水平的家庭,朋友,社區,縣,州或國家一級? 我相信,有效的生態教育是唯一將減緩人口增長緩慢的盲目消費,抵制貪婪和無知的土地利用的做法,並,最後導致人與人之間的和我們寶貴的地球的生態健全的關係。

    回复

  27. kristey,Caoback說:

    什麼都信仰或沒有,你相信他們都有一個共同點,那就是動物,魚類和鳥類在這裡先人類。 所以很明顯,我們需要他們為人類的生存。 誰知道什麼物種的滅絕將是我們自己的滅亡。 我們人類怎麼敢讓這種情況發生,以及如何無知和愚蠢的,那些不認為它的事項。
    拯救瀕危物種,戴避孕套請!

    回复

  28. Karen說:

    不good.A我們很多人有不尊重其他形式為自然money.Respect life.Only在home.Parents開始應教導青少年。

    回复

  29. 馬塞爾說:

    多gone.At最後,我們還要在同一貨幣us.To小船在nature.Only利益的way.To mnay

    回复

  30. 納撒尼爾說:

    我照顧,我是真正為這損失傷心,但我相信他們是這一物種的希望,如果我們所有關心和幫助。

    回复

  31. 米夏埃拉說:

    我不在乎,我很傷心。 是的,我沒有什麼保存這隻鳥。 但如果你問你能做什麼呢? 我的回答是每天消費做出正確的選擇,關心的事情是如何生產,其中,支持綠色環保產品,節約能源,要小心你周圍的環境,不只是說說而已,並知道什麼是正確的,正確的,但要做到。 我現在住在巴西,它是生物多樣性最豐富的國家,我曾經訪問......令人吃驚的是在早上去慢跑,看到小猴子,tucanos,各種動物的聲音喚醒tousands,聞到晚上花大約有如此純淨的這一切......我相信解決的辦法是假設我們每一個人的責任和生活我們不會忘記子孫後代的生活!

    回复

  32. 安德魯·珀說:

    另一場悲劇。 但是,誰真正關心呢? 我覺得對過去的狼,熊或GB,是最DONT死亡河狸傷心。 鸊鷉將dissapear從天真蒙昧走向下一個偉大的物種滅絕千百萬人的集體回憶,我們的職業生涯(上升),對不起,多數民眾贊成渡過目前的物種滅絕。 具有諷刺意味的是,的的火山temporaily停止位飛行時vulcanism(規模更大)導致以前的大規模滅絕。 所以到明年鸊鷉。

    回复

  33. 阿比德說:

    我總是舉出一個物種的重要性,例如...
    早在30年左右的中國城市由於蜜蜂過剩的主操作被殺死那些最每一個生命週期,但在未來幾年感到不安,授粉停止逸岸乾旱和問題有一個條件,持續至是不是重新蜜蜂......這足以告訴我們連接到每一個實物有多深?

    回复

  34. 克勞福德說:

    人類人口過剩-仍在上升看到http://math.berkeley.edu/〜蓋倫/ popclk.html的 -這個星球上的根在這麼多的環境問題和生物多樣性,是這個星球上,確實是人類本身面臨著。 我們將做任何事情,儘管? 我不會屏住呼吸。

    回复

  35. 沙基爾·艾哈邁德說:

    我有紅色此電子郵件,有關鳥類已經滅絕,我都感到非常悲傷,當我問這些人誰殺害或謀殺的鳥類,他們應該為人類shamefull因為鳥類是從神specilay色彩飽滿鳥類天賦是最美麗的我們應該關心的鳥和應準備刨如何增加在這個世界上鳥類的一代,我們應該防止那些誰殺鳥的人。

    回复

  36. 里克·韋伯說:

    我關心。

    對於這類活​​動,產生這些結果的理由是他們提供改善人類的生活質量,但肯定沒有這一切的美麗的多樣性的未來世界將減少,質量。 當我們說'夠了'。

    回复

  37. NicoleB,埃及說:

    查理提出了一個好點的。

    我關心。
    但我沒有做任何事情,以防止這種情況的發生?
    答案是:沒 :(

    回复

  38. 亨里克·斯蒂·默勒湯姆森說:

    Because we´ll never get a chance to see that bird alive again, and our children and coming generation will not get that chance either.

    回复

  39. Evelyne Lapouge Says:

    I care because life is “sacred”. Everything is sacred or nothing is. To loose a specie is to loose a bit of ourselves.

    回复

  40. Harry Says:

    Yes, I care; grebes are one of my favourite families of birds. A day when you see a grebe is a day which is not completely wasted. And now there's one less kind in the world. One less source of joy.

    回复

  41. Verkus Says:

    it is very sad, i think all humans should pickup and live on one continent and leave the others as natural reserves.

    回复

  42. Shermon Says:

    Im from South Africa and im not a bird person, but of course I care.
    You just said it Beth (above).
    How sad this planet has become

    回复

  43. Brenton Head Says:

    With all the sadness of the loss of the Grebe , there is something positve WE can all do! The world's rarest Madagascan Duck, the Pochard needs all of our help!!!!!!

    We can save this species!

    回复

  44. Fionnuala Says:

    I care that everything is prettified, that woods have paved paths, that nettles are cut down and that only a few popular animals are given any hope of survival. It is theft from the future. It is a failure to see what is there.

    回复

  45. RK Birjit Singh Says:

    If this trend continues uncheck, than the day will not be too far for us to meet the doomsday following the steps of Martha,Dodo, Pink headed duck.And the day will be too late for mankind to realise the importance of our fellow species that we share on this planet.

    回复

  46. Charlie Says:

    Yes, I care, undoubtedly I care. And I'll care about all the upcoming extinctions. But that's not going to be enough. Perhaps a better question might be, “You say you care, what did you do to help?”. I did nothing for the Alaotra Grebe – and now it's too late. Too hairshirt? Perhaps, but unless we are all prepared to help it really doesn't matter how much we say we care.

    回复

  47. 瑪麗里亞Kalouli說:

    當任何物種滅絕,它為我們這個星球的報警電話。 人認識到,我們今天利用我們的資源的方式將是對地球和人類產生不利。 傷心,豈有此理!

    回复

  48. 格雷格·賴博說:

    大生意,小生意,維持生計,不小心引進外來物種,意外的引進,等等等等......無論什麼原因,我們已經失去了另一個物種。
    最重要的是學習和提高我們的機制,盡力阻止它再次發生......這是我的大問題。 任何想法嗎?

    回复

  49. nudrat賽義德說:

    真的很傷心。 人們沒有意識到whts hpping的時候,他們意識到自己的愚蠢,這將是太晚了.........

    回复

  50. 琳達·摩根說:

    我們關閉一切殺害後,地球將不支持人類生活。 “不要問喪鐘為誰而鳴,它為你而鳴。”

    回复

  51. 塞爾瑪說:

    我感到非常難過。 每一個物種,有利於地球的有價值的東西。 鳥類,尤其是無辜的生物 - 空氣精神 - 這是我們的職責,作為假想的最高度進化的物種,以保護這些無辜的,並確保他們的生存。 我覺得我們正在不斷地讓自然世界 - 我們自己不利。 對於每一個物種,結束最多滅絕位越光熄滅的世界。 我悲傷今天在這美麗的鳥兒的損失。 我對不起小鸊鷉。 我會救你,如果我能。

    回复

  52. 匿名說:

    除了它是我們的責任,以拯救瀕臨滅絕的物種,它也是我們的責任,年輕的一代能夠享受大自然提供的消息,我們的野生動物資源,顏色,習性,對野生動物的聲音。

    國際自然及自然資源保護聯盟和國際鳥類有動員公眾輿論(包括學校和大學生),加強監測,籌集資金和招募志願者,在節約紅色名錄的物種。

    回复

  53. 阿莉達梅爾森說:

    地球對人類是一種罕見的寶石,據我們所知,宇宙以及。 隨著每滅絕一個地球上的寶貴方面的損失。 這是一個警告,我們在相同的方向前進。 所有的生命是寶貴的,每個品種的獨特和寶貴的生態系統。 一旦它不見了,它不見了。 這是我們唯一的星球。 我覺得我們可以更好地照顧它。

    回复

  54. 薩拉Klain說:

    這一悲慘的滅絕事件,需要立即引起注意,在馬達加斯加和其他許多發展中國家解決貧困的關鍵問題,世界生物多樣性的主機多。 除非人類的基本需求得到滿足,人,特別是婦女,教育,棲息地的破壞,將繼續和野生動物滅絕的名單會越來越長。

    回复

  55. 邁克爾Rieser說:

    任何時間,成為前一個物種滅絕,人類的代理人,是一個不可估量的比例的悲劇。 可能這陰沉的例子,作為一個教訓,​​所有地球上的生命是脆弱的和不可替代的,滅絕是可以預防的。

    回复

  56. 約翰·倫納德說:

    每去滅絕的物種,我們自己的滅絕臨近。

    回复

  57. 布列塔尼說:

    我想,生活會更容易,如果我不在乎,但它完全滅絕的野生動物生物學領域推到我這樣。 世界已經永遠失去了一個獨特的生物,我們永遠不會真正知道我們已經失去了。 這樣的悲劇。

    回复

  58. 責任說:

    投票您如何決定世界的命運! 當任何選舉或重新選舉的政客的方式有人聲稱他們投票的基礎上,你失敗了自己和世界。 絕不應該僅僅根據他或她的知名度職位政客被否決! 一個政治家不應該留在人害怕罷免或彈劾政客基於政治立場。 當你讓家人,朋友,鄰居,同事等,會影響你的票,你失敗了,自己和世界各地! 任何誰懦夫離回顧或彈劾一個壞/腐敗的政客(尤其是政客,不關心保護我們的自然環境),完全不尊重我們的美國憲法和人權法案。 懦夫是一個壞/腐敗的政治家,誰更好地幫助政治家被損壞的資產。

    我說出上面的,因為它是懦弱的公民,我們的環境,是真正的殺手! 它是懦夫的世界,讓壞的/腐敗的政客繼續留任。 政客得到與他們的腐敗行為,因為懦夫給他們的權力是腐敗。 美國公民如果真的想我們的政府變得更好,更多的人需要停止是懦夫,並開始走出辦公室回顧和彈劾壞/腐敗的政客! 我們現在有一個在任的總統認為沒有笑時,他被指控是社會主義! (任何我們過去的總統會表現出憤怒的態度,不笑,如果媒體描繪成任何他們是社會主義者),我們在辦公室主席(和他的妻子),現在他們都認為這是更重要的是對涵蓋了所有的時尚雜誌,那麼它是在我們的自然環境下降被解僱了!

    現在,我們的總統顯示了相同的陰涼地認識,做同樣的“秘密”閉門會議,得到了尼克松彈劾! 為什麼尼克松被彈劾,但奧巴馬是不是? 如果奧巴馬真的認真了美國總統的頭銜,他不會允許自己或家人被作為一個時尚的描繪。 人們需要說話了,不再是懦夫,並要求奧巴馬和他的妻子,總統辦公室非常重視。 美國人民的需要,要求總統和米歇爾·奧巴馬停止播放的相機,並開始了非常嚴重的問題困擾著我們的國家和世界上的濃度。 美國總統的標題不應該被用來作為好萊塢或時尚事業的踏腳石! 作為人民懦夫長期遠離政治召回和彈劾程序,我們的自然環境仍然是注定!

    回复

  59. 蒂莫Rissanen說:

    每一個物種是寶貴的,每一個滅絕的不可逆轉 - 如何將一個克隆最小可存活種群數量? 這是可悲的,它只是許多這樣的公告,在未來幾年來。 愛斯基摩鴴,寶ª歐力,皇家啄木鳥等等。 我們知道他們走了,等待一個最後的手續。 然而,重要的是,保持積極的讚揚保存黑色羅賓,紅腹灰雀亞速爾群島和許多的努力,並繼續支持努力保護和恢復這些物種依賴於各種生態系統。 正如一個朋友所說的那樣,作為一個孩子,他與恐龍的滅絕。 對此談談你的孩子,但也談論其他物種保存無數多的不懈努力。 所有的希望都不會丟失,即使今天,它花了相當大的凹痕。

    回复

  60. 羅伯特·斯尼德說:

    我當然關心。 這是非常不幸的。

    回复

  61. CEBE說:

    這是可悲的,可怕,可恥。
    是我照顧我的心真的是空的,而我看了這則新聞,並意識到這方面的損失是多麼悲慘。
    一個無辜的生命,這是值得慶幸這輩子將永遠不會再看到美麗的顏色。
    滅絕...........
    “權力”的創建和銷毀的錢,...
    真的很傷心。

    回复

  62. 約翰ISOM說:

    我完全不在乎。

    足夠的國際機構談。 我們需要採取行動。

    John Isom

    回复

  63. Timo Rissanen Says:

    Every species is precious, every extinction irreversible – how would one clone a minimum viable population? And sad as this is, it is just many of such announcements to come during the next few years. Eskimo Curlew, Po ªouli, Imperial Woodpecker and so forth. We know they're gone, waiting for one last formality. It is important, however, to remain positive and commend the efforts that have saved the Black Robin, Azores Bullfinch and many more, and continue to support efforts to protect and restore various ecosystems that these species rely upon. As a friend put it, as a kid he associated extinction with dinosaurs. Talk to your kids about this, but also talk about the tireless efforts of countless many to save other species. All hope is not lost, even if today it took a dent.

    回复

  64. Lucien Says:

    As a New Zealander I've been brought up to have concern and knowledge of the importance of every breed of bird animal or tree and it is always tragic to learn that a species is completely gone forever.
    Hopefully this news will alert people to the fact that there are other birds in the same predicament but no matter how endangered they are, it is never too late to bring them back from the brink.
    It takes money and people who care, along with a massive shift in understanding and the way we all treat our environment.

    回复

  65. Zainab Adeiza Says:

    This is so heart breaking!!!
    This only goes to show that one can only but do so much.. As an aspiring conservationist occurrences like this makes me wonder if am on the right track or if this is a futile mission and only a meal ticket.
    I care a lot and can only hope we all care enough to do something positive and long lasting to help the remaining species…
    :-)

    回复

  66. Lloyd Says:

    Another fine example of mankinds egotistical greed and carelessness towards this world of ours, it is time for the governments and the world to wake up and pay attention to matters that count. This disgusts and saddens me.

    回复

  67. Duncan Says:

    Every time something unique is lost it is sad.

    回复

  68. Lloyd Says:

    Another fine example of humanities egotistical desires and greed and careless attitude towards this world of ours, everybody on this planet should care while there are still birds to care about. Imagine how grey this world would be without the joyous site of our feathered friends and their songs. Time for the governments to wake up and start concerning themselves over matter such as these. This disgusts me.

    回复

  69. Zainab Adeiza Says:

    This is so heart breaking… It only goes to show that one can only but do so much and for an aspiring conservationist like me it makes me ask myself am i on the right track?? is this a futile cause?? because every species lost marks a failure….

    回复

  70. Mojo Says:

    Birdlife International needs extinctions like this to raise it's profile. If it's about preventing extinctions, take these birds and put them in protected habitats, after all how much space is needed to protect the last pair. Oh wait, how did we get here in the first place? Did they wake up one morning and find there was only one pair left?
    While it's sad to see the demise of any species, surely if when a species reaches a critically low level, too low to maintain its existence, at least in the wild, it's time to remove them from the wild to try and maintain a captive population, and hope return them to the wild when the possibility of survival had improved. Let's use whatever resources we have, to help endangered species with sustainable populations, those that may actually may benefit from those resources.
    Is this about us or the birds? How much money, time, manpower etc. has Birdlife international used on this bird, when did they know it was in terminal decline? Have these resources been wasted (of course they have, the bird's gone), when they could have been deployed elsewhere?

    Yes, I'm sad to see this or any species become extinct.

    回复

  71. Mark Mowbray Says:

    What an absolute disgrace. This should never be allowed to happen anymore there is so much cash ready for projects like protection of endangered species something should've been done a long time ago to help this poor bird.

    VERY SAD INDEED

    回复

  72. Corey Says:

    I care. And while I wish that this bird will be the last I know it won't, especially considering the coming mass extinction due to global warming.

    Why should we care about the permanent death of this species? Because if we can care about who Tiger Woods slept with, or who Angelina Jolie adopted, or any other inane celebrity drivel we should certainly be able to care about an entire species disappearing from the earth forever. I only wish that passing of the Alaotra Grebe would get 1/100 the attention that a sex scandal would…

    回复

  73. Ken Tucker Says:

    I care. How arrogant and selfish we are.

    回复

  74. Charlie Says:

    Of course I care, but a better question might be to ask me, “What did you do to stop this extinction happening?” I did nothing and because of that it hardly seems to matter how much I care at all.

    回复

  75. Nancy Patterson Says:

    I care….I cried and wrote this poem in my journal:

    Little Bird Gone by Nancy Patterson

    Who mourns for you, little bird?

    Struggling to stay alive.

    Numbers decline,

    Man speaks his greed

    Every thing must listen.

    Who speaks for you, little bird?

    Gone now for probably decades,

    Your song is no more

    Asking only for one little lake

    in the whole world.

    Selfish you were not.

    All you wanted was to live

    and you were silenced.

    Today you are forever remembered

    As your name was placed on a list

    of forgotten creatures.

    Who will enter the final entry

    When Man is the last to go?

    回复

  76. Perry Stahlsis Says:

    Smash Anthropocentrism!

    回复

  77. Sophia Says:

    We all care to some extent. Our ignorance and selfishness will be our downfall.

    回复

  78. Zed Says:

    I care. Every different thread in the self-perpetuating chemical reaction of life is a wonderful beautiful thing, and should be propagated as long as possible.
    Everyone would agree that a world with no other life but humans and cockroaches would be tragically diminished, everyone would start caring at some point: but for most people that point is far off in an impoverished future. We need to draw the line now – a world with *any* fewer species is tragically diminished.

    回复

  79. Chris Abrams Says:

    The main problem is the get rich quick attitude that governments need to advertise to get elected. Or remove corrupt governments who support people with short-term interests who care only about their own lives – not future lives. Sadly, it needs a whole load of countries to get together and exert pressure on countries who do not comply with simple guidlines on conservation issues. How you do that – heaven alone knows!

    回复

  80. Nicholas Says:

    I chose this bird as my Wikipedia name to honour it's fight for survival, and hoping it would survive. Another species destroyed in large part by plundering, pillaging, raping fishermen. These people must be brought under control. Many grebe species are threatened by similar problems to those confronted by the Alaotra.

    Nicholas

    回复

  81. Jan Axel Says:

    It is so sad… another one gone. It is our fault, we need to focus all our efforts on those critical endangered birds and its habitats!

    回复

  82. Kay W Says:

    I care. And we should not give up, there seem to have been some successful recoveries from “the brink of extinction” for a few spp because of tireless efforts of too few people who care – but at the same time I am pessimistic: human sp is the problem, hell-bent on engulfing/outcompeting/displacing/eradicating/extirpating everything else. Unless the “saved” spp has adequate and protected habitat for perpetuity it has just had a temporary reprieve from ultimately truly dissappearing forever.

    回复

  83. Mark Anderson Says:

    “we have seen the enemy and it is us.”

    回复

  84. mostafa Says:

    i think that creatures makes a big link between them and every living creature has its role to play in life and in this link and is a very important element in maintaining the stability of our daily life , so if any of these creatures was missed of this link this would surly make a fatal shortage in this link wish eventualy ends with a big problem for all

    回复

  85. Heinz Remold Says:

    The extinction of the Alaotra grebe is especially tragic, because it would clearly have been possible to transfer breeding pairs to other lakes or ponds without carnivorous fish before it was too late. This is clearly a lack of commitment or oversight of the government and other organizations. There is enough money wasted on other environmental issues, which make the extinction of the grebe (the Junin greebe will soon follow!)unforgivable.

    回复

  86. Karen Riggs Says:

    Every single loss of a species, whether it is a bird, mammal or insect, disturbs the complex web of life and renders it more vulnerable to disease, pestilence and extinction. As caretakers of this planet, it is our responsibility to ensure the viable future of each and every species possible. We are but a small part of a vast ecosystem, all connected and all living.

    回复

  87. Phil Matthews Says:

    A lot of people do care but feel helpless in the face of pure hatred by landowners, loggers, farmers, hunters etc who help to wipe out whole species with their complete disregard for wildlife and their lust for more money for themselves and their shareholders.

    回复

  88. Marsha Says:

    I do care, very much. But what can one person do? Who's responsible for allowing the gill nets? Who introduced the invasive predator fish to the lake where this species lived? They are the ones at fault here. Actually, all humanity is at fault to some degree. For centuries we have taken and taken and taken until the Earth has very little left to give. Humans will continue to take until there's nothing left.

    One day, we will be very sorry for the damage we have to Mother Earth. But by then, it will be too late to begin to care.

    回复

  89. Alan Tilmouth Says:

    Every species we lose is another badge of shame for mankind. Sadly not enough care, this will not make the national news bulletins in the UK or any other European country I suspect. Probably 98% of humans will never of heard of Alaotra Grebe.
    The RSPB has 1m members, less than 2% of the UK who care. Most people spend more on satellite TV in one month than they contribute to conservation, what does that say about us?

    回复

  90. Bester Mudereri Says:

    Its so sad, there is need for more funding and research to be channeled towards management of species which are almost extinct. This is sad news indeed just the thought that we shall and will never have that species again.

    Lets all work together i our own local environments to make a change globally

    回复

  91. mike ole parsaoti Says:

    it is very sad.we need to do something to our environment to stop further extinctions.

    回复

  92. Ben Says:

    Sad news. The point Simon raises is important: it's not enough just to care. We need to take action so that other birds don't follow the Aloatra Grebe into the abyss. We can take personal action to reduce our consumption and energy use, and perhaps even more importantly, we can also take political action by letting our politicians know what sort of society we want to live in: one in which there is space for nature and in which we decide to put limits on human consumption.

    回复

  93. Ken Mwathe Says:

    It is sad for such a beautiful bird to disappear. The Global Community should support BirdLife to prevent any further Extinctions.

    回复

  94. Sandra Loor-Vela Says:

    Such a beautiful bird, another terrible loss. I do care.

    回复

  95. Sarah Says:

    I care. This is a tragedy but there is always hope in the future. Keep working towards saving these species that are in need!

    回复

  96. Brenda Says:

    Another tragic loss. I do care.

    回复

  97. Josephine Mundava Says:

    It really is a sad. Such a waste as well, since we can all exist on this planet, all we need to do is be considerate.
    More needs to be done to educate the people living with the endangered species. Legal measures should be put in place to protect the species, and legislation put in place to prosecute offenders. Talking about it only will not help the other species that are in danger of extnction. ACTION IS NEEDED.

    回复

  98. Robert Says:

    Demanding reasons to justify that which all compassionate, informed people value is a devilish sleight-of-hand on the part of profit-driven businessmen and politicians. I say answer not a fool according to his folly.

    回复

  99. Counting Coots Says:

    Another gone, the cynic in me knows that unfortunately it will not be the last…

    保持良好的工作。

    回复

  100. Cornwall Birding Says:

    Of course we care, but as we sit here with our technology, it doesn't matter how much we care if the locals are ignorant to a species' plight. What was being done to educate the fisherman? Will the person (if it was a person?) who introduced the fish to the habitat be brought to justice? How long will it be before our summer visitors are extinct thanks to the ignorance of european hunters blasting everything from the skies? Lets hope our new UK Government does something about the likes of Malta breaking EU Hunting Laws.

    回复

  101. The Urban Birder Says:

    It grieves me to hear of the demise of any animal species and the Alaotra Grebe is no exception. When will we learn that these extinctions are not only robbing us and our children of beautiful creatures but it is fueling our own demise.

    I can only hope that there's a hidden population of these grebes still persisting waiting for rediscovery.

    回复

  102. carmen Says:

    We are all teached some Ecology at school and high school, but like with many other subjects, we don't realize it is useful or see the 'practical point'. Species play a role in an ecosystem, and even if predictions and models are made, how can we be completely sure removing some of them (putting key species aside) will mean removing ourselves from the system? And there's the feeling and the ethics, which of course, the non-romantic people always exclude.

    回复

  103. Keith Murdock Says:

    Every time we meddle we do more harm than good. Introducing sport fish for peoples pleasure killed off this superb bird. We must take responsibility for our actions. When we purchase an item we are responsible for how it was made and delivered. If we use pesticides we are responsible for the harm they do. In our gardens if we use slug pellets don't expect to hear Song Thrushes. We will cause more extinctions because of our greed & self interest. I can't explain how sad I am when I hear of an extintion but please lets turn this sad day into a turning point, please support all efforts to save our wonderful diverse wild life. Please support Birdlife International.

    回复

  104. John S.Armitage Says:

    Yet another illustration of mankinds' neglect and abuse of an element of our natural heritage. The introduction of gill nets and carnivorous fish are both associated with conscious decisions taken by humans, the individuals from which should be brought to book in some way. If a valuable painting or artefact of international repute and value was allowed to deteriorate and be destroyed there would undoubtedly be a backlash and enquiry. Why does our natural heritage command such little respect by comparison?. Each component is an irreplaceable gem arising out of evolutionary “progression” and not an item we should feel free to tamper with or neglect in any way. Yet another sad example of our arrogance!

    回复

  105. TriBen Says:

    Sad to see Alaotra grebe confirmed extinct – a number of other similar species at risk like Titicaca Grebe and Junin Grebe…

    回复

  106. Terry Kelly Says:

    Another aspect of the universe diminished; a creature removed from existence, by our actions or inactions.
    This Earth will look after itself, we're rubbish and need removed; give something else a chance.

    回复

  107. Tov Says:

    The Earth does not belong to us, we belong to the Earth. Man did not weave the web of life, he is merely a strand in it. Whatever he does to the web, he does to himself.

    回复

  108. Sara Says:

    Gutted.
    I care because every species has the right to exist, and humans have no right to end the existence of a species.

    回复

  109. Carolyn Says:

    This is another blow to biodiversity. A very sad loss of a beautiful bird which survived thousands of years of adaptation and evolution only to come undone at the hands of man. We know that what is good for birds is good for humans so we need to do far more to protect habitats.

    回复

  110. Charles Says:

    What a great loss! I sincerely hope the Madagascar Pochard has got a better future on this magnificent island!

    回复

  111. Lee Hall Says:

    Gone forever. It is a sad day.

    Why do I care? I am an animal-rights proponent. And a community of beings will never have rights (protected interests, that is — in brief, respect) if they are gone before we learn to extend this concept.

    Lee Hall
    VP – Legal Affairs
    Friends of Animals

    回复

  112. Bird Endowment Says:

    Very sad news!

    回复

  113. Tara Tiki Says:

    What a sad loss to the world.

    回复

  114. Tom Says:

    This is very bad news. Its not even the sort of animal you keep in captivity.

    回复

  115. DJH1981 Says:

    Gutted about the extinct grebe.

    回复

  116. chaoskay Says:

    News like this always makes my heart sink. So very sad….

    回复

  117. Brennan King Says:

    This is devastating!

    回复

  118. Dave Rogers Says:

    Mankind is on the extinction list as well, but with us it's self inflicted. We are a heavy duty user and abuser/polluter of nature. A waster of non-replenishable resources at alarming rates.

    We are the few minutes to midnight phase of our existence and there is nothing we can do about it.

    回复

  119. Nick Says:

    One extinction is one too many.

    Two bilion of years of evolution and this beautiful species will never be seen again.

    回复

  120. Simon Attwood Says:

    It's tragic of course, but it begs the question:
    'as more species become extinct (and general global trajectories across taxa, habitats and regions indicate they quite probably will), are the public, media and decision makers going to become increasingly concerned and galvanised into actions commensurate to scale of the problem? Alternatively, will more frequent extinctions and losses lead to greater desensitisation and weary indifference?'

    回复

  121. Brenton Head Says:

    What tragic news. We all have to try harder and committ ourselves to bird conservation. Any species lost is no longer acceptible in a supposed civilised world with endless financial ability to save species.

    回复

  122. Beth Baisch Says:

    While logistically there probably is other life in the universe, we have *no actual proof* and so every species, is special. It will never again exist. And we just killed another.

    回复


發表評論